Bible Believers' Newsletter 1158

"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; we are pleased you could join us in fellowship around God's unchanging Word.

Android PhoneThe pale horse is riding through the world today inoculating whom he will in accord with Revelation 6:8 and The Protocol 10:19-20 of the Learned Elders of Zion: "But you yourselves perfectly well know that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases, by want, so that the "Goyim" see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else. But if we give the nations of the world a breathing space the moment we long for is hardly likely ever to arrive." This is today's world.

This special edition of our Church Newsletter is unplanned. It is necessary reading because I feel few of us carefully read the Full story behind the current news, or read the Scripture references and other links to "prove whether those things are so. I will not neglect to put you always in remembrance of these things, though you know them, and be established in the present truth."

We must study the Message, proving it with God's unchanging Word from Genesis to Revelation as our goal is to know Christ personally, not just attend Church or read this Newsletter. "We must study to show our self approved unto God, a workman that need not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth." For Daniel prophesied, "he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries".

The 'hidden hand' controls all of the world leaders of religion, politics, banking, finance, industry, business, and through them people like you and me. We have two main articles by new contributing authors. "COVID Vaccine Necessity, Efficacy and Safety" prepared by doctors4covidethics demonstrates that the inoculations are unnecessary, lack efficacy, and are dangerous. Read this carefully!

brainwashOur second main article by the renowned Dr. Joseph Mercola explains "Fear is Contagious and used to Control YOU." Our mastoids are mercilessly bashed by the constant Covid-19 propaganda of fear when we have nothing to fear but fear itself and the dangerous untested and frequently deadly unapproved inoculations. Public Relations can be the subtle persuasion practiced by the Devil-incarnate Serpent in the Garden of Eden that was made into an artifice by the Jew Edward Bernays.

Bertrand Russell said, "It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody [children] of anything, if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment. This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship." [As in the Great Reset of the UNO and WEF] . . . Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rightly confined to the governing class and the populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated . . . education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they will be incapable . . . of thinking or acting otherwise than their schoolmasters would have wished".

Here is a fine example quoted by Caldwell & Zanfagna in their book "Fluoridation and Truth Decay," from writings of Edward L. Bernays: "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses must be done by experts, the public relations counsels (Bernays invented the term); they are the invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions . . . the most direct way to reach the herd is through the leaders. . . . all this must be planned . . . indoctrination must be subtle. It should be worked into the everyday life of the people—24 hours a day in hundreds of ways . . . A redefinition of ethics is necessary . . . the subject matter of propaganda need not necessarily be true".

Do you know where YOU are; where the world is today? The above quotations were taken from "Brain-Wash" an essay on the manipulation of the public mind for private power and profit written by my late friend Alan Gourley. It may be downloaded from your Church Website. Read it, and learn.

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. We encourage you to share our Newsletter with friends, family and colleagues, and look forward to any comments or questions you may have. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott


US seizing Iranian and other Arab Government Websites

US shut down of Iran TV

June 22, 2021 — Cowardly world governments that are about to cooperate with Israel's new conehead in the destruction of Iran cannot shut down servers under the .ir extension. If you are going to destroy a country, you cannot have them screaming to the world via outlets they have elsewhere. So you FIRST have to shut those down.

There is definitely a plan afoot to blow Iran to smithereens in the IMMEDIATE FUTURE, and someone wants full control over the narrative. Iranian media outlets now being seized by American and other governments; Iran may only be the tip of the iceberg.

Tasnimnews is a .com and is not seized yet. Presstv.com has been seized by the US government. Iranian television channels have also had their sites seized. Israel will not want Iranians to be able to tell the outside world what is going on. The Iranian election really did not go the way the non-Semitic impostors. Full story: lualuatv.com


Sobering Statistics (sponsored by African Development Bank)

CFR Logo

June 22, 2021 — As wealthy countries prepare to reopen for the summer after their populations are largely vaccinated, Africa faces a third wave of COVID-19 infections. A series of sobering statistics reveal how dire the pandemic still is for the continent. Africa has now surpassed more than 5 million COVID-19 cases, a grim milestone on a continent that initially seemed to be spared the worst of the global pandemic. Africa accounts for just 2.9 percent of cases globally but 3.7 percent of deaths. What's more, previous studies show seriously ill COVID-19 patients are more likely to die in Africa than anywhere else in the world. [Fear not, this is CFR, USA propaganda – Ed].

New infections. In May, the continent recorded an average 20 percent surge in cases, with some countries seeing a 30 percent surge, including South Africa, Namibia, Angola, and Uganda. The latter saw a 131 percent week-on-week rise toward the end of May. Uganda has recorded more than 71,500 cases, but the numbers could be much higher as testing rates remain low. As hospitals fill up and deaths mount, Uganda has introduced new restrictions in a bid to slow the third wave. The Delta variant, first discovered in India, has been identified in 14 African countries as of June 17. Nearly two thirds of 88,000 new cases recorded in the first week of June were attributed to just five countries: Egypt, South Africa, Tunisia, Uganda, and Zambia. This new wave of infections is already placing strain on health care facilities. A World Health Organization (WHO) survey of 23 countries showed most had less than one intensive care unit bed per 100,000 people. Even fewer had intensive care units equipped with ventilators. [The "surge of infections" is based on the PCR fake tests and ventilators are a death trap – Ed].

Missed goal. Nearly 90 percent of African countries are set to miss a September target to vaccinate 10 percent of their populations. The goal, set by the World Health Organization, is still lower than in most wealthier nations but essential in curbing the spread of the pandemic in Africa. Only seven countries are on track to reach the goal: Comoros, Equatorial Guinea, Mauritius, Morocco, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, and Zimbabwe. Six more, Eswatini, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Rwanda, and Tunisia, could reach the target if they received a boost in vaccine supply.

Vaccines in short supply. As the current wave of infections threatens to overtake previous peaks, vaccine rollouts still lag behind. About 12 million people are fully vaccinated, which is less than 1 percent of Africa's population. More than 5 million jabs were administered per week in mid-June, but that is still likely too slow to outpace the current infection rate. Much of the slow rate of vaccinations is the result of constrained supply as wealthier nations continue to hoard vaccines and the Serum Institute of India, a major producer of the AstraZeneca vaccine, slows exports and redirects its supplies to counter India's own devastating surge. African leaders have held several meetings to discuss . . . Full story: ADB & CFR propaganda.


COVID-19 VACCINE – 210 Deaths, 24,000 Adverse Reactions

Commonwealth Statistics

June 22, 2021 — The Australian government's Therapeutic Goods Administration (the equivalent to the FDA in the US) report confirms 210 deaths and 24,000 adverse reactions after the COVID-19 vaccines. There are over 5,000 deaths in the USA attributed to COVID vaccines including Pfizer.

While I support the use of vaccines that have approval for general use, I am very concerned by the use of this vaccine on the general population. My understanding is that emergency use of a medicine is only authorized in the US if the person receiving the treatment is in immediate danger of dying. This is not the case with millions of Australians who are not ill. The simple fact is that we don't have one-year safety data, three-year safety data, or five-year safety data for the use of the COVID-19 vaccine on humans or animals. Over 50% of animals in the animal trials have died.

I do not understand why it is that millions of Australians should be subject to a medical treatment that has not complied with normal practices.

There is no pandemic in Australia—only one person has died of COVID in 2021. The TGA and the government have spread misleading information designed to create fear in the population. The Center for Disease Control website in the United States confirms the following effects that their vaccine program has had using the same vaccines that the TGA has approved in Australia—over 5,000 deaths, 3,900 disabled, 571 miscarriages, 1,500 Bell's Palsy, and 1,900 heart attacks. The Governments around Australia have done a great job in protecting all Australians from COVID-19 and for healthy Australians to receive such a treatment is, as I understand it, unprecedented. I don't understand why Australians need to rush or take risks with their lives.

And I don't understand why the Australian Government has granted the pharmaceutical companies a complete indemnity should their COVID-19 vaccines cause illness or death. It would appear that these pharmaceutical companies lack confidence in their own products, which makes them ask for such an indemnity. No one will be successful in court if the government has indemnified the pharmaceutical companies.

We need to maintain the very high standards Australia has set for itself in the approvals of vaccines.

The COVID 19 Vaccine doesn't stop you from getting COVID and it doesn't stop you from passing it on. Does it serve any real purpose?

God bless Australia, Clive Palmer M.P. Full story: thetruthaboutcovidvaccines.com

Comment: New TGA Safety update—Now 24,402 adverse reactions.
Death data REMOVED.
Guillain-Barre syndrome added as adverse event of interest.
Adverse events of special interest we are monitoring for both vaccines include:
• clotting disorders without thrombocytopenia (low platelets) including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis
• anaphylaxis
• thrombocytopenia without thrombosis
• seizures
• acute cardiac injury, for example myocarditis and pericarditis, heart failure and cardiogenic shock, arrhythmia
• facial weakness or paralysis, for example Bell's palsy
• loss of sense of taste or smell (also called ageusia or anosmia)
• Guillain-Barre syndrome.


Financial Blowout ahead: Lobotomized Economists clash on Deck of the Titanic

SS Titanic

June 13, 2021 — Under the new world order of "stakeholder capitalism" citizens will learn to own nothing and be happy . . . As the geniuses running the western financial bubble sometimes called an "economy" continue to double down on their obsession to pump a dead financial system with ever more trillions in stimulus spending, arguments are raging among brainwashed economists living in denial over the oncoming systemic collapse. The thought of engineers on the Titanic passionately arguing over whether they should accelerate or decelerate the speed of the boat whose hull has long been torn to shreds by an iceberg comes to mind . . . Both sides however, are either completely ignorant or outright liars trying to distract citizens and policy makers from the real systemic nature of the oncoming meltdown . . . Full story: strategic-culture.org


Parents cultured Children's Masks & found Dangerous Bacteria

June 16, 2021 — The idea of children, including preschoolers, walking around with bacteria traps on their breathing orifices all day so shocked the conscience that last summer, a bunch of internet parodies were produced illustrating such absurdity. Then, within weeks, most local governments mandated this cruel form of child abuse for an entire year without any study of the side effects. Now a group of parents from the Gainesville, Florida, area have shown that such masks are traps for harmful bacteria that potentially make children much sicker than from COVID—the virus for which the masks were required, but failed to mitigate.

. . . six Alachua County, Florida, parents reported the findings of the lab cultures of their children's masks worn in school. The parents sent the six masks to the University of Florida's Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center after they were worn for five to eight hours, most during in-person schooling by children ages 6 through 11 . . . the face masks studied in this analysis were new or freshly laundered before wearing. One of the masks submitted was from an adult who wore it at work as a cosmetologist.

The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria.

The lab used a method called proteomics to extract proteins from the masks and sequence them. The analysis detected the following 11 alarmingly dangerous pathogens on the masks:

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
  • Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
  • Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
  • Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, bloodstream infections, meningitis,
    UTIs— resistant to antibiotics)
  • Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
  • Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
  • Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
  • Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires' disease)
  • Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)
  • Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)
  • "Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria," according to the release. "One-third was contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third was contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more." . . . No pathogens were found on the controls . . . Full story: globalresearch.ca


    Former Head Scientist at Pfizer Says Covid Threat is 100% Fake

    May 16, 2021 — Prior to forming his own biotech company in 2011, Michael Yeadon was the Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer for Allergy & Respiratory Research at Pfizer Pharmaceutical. He is a top scientist in the world of drugs and vaccines in the treatment of respiratory diseases such as Covid. In this video he declares that the Covid pandemic is a fraud. He explains why masks are useless, why distancing is absurd, why PCR tests are meaningless, why quarantining healthy people is stupid, why variants of virus strains are no threat, and why Covid vaccines should be rejected. Yeadon says many of his colleagues privately agree with this appraisal but remain silent to protect their salaries and research grants. It's all about money. He concludes that, because of the massive number of deaths that will follow within a few years of vaccination, there clearly is an agenda to deliberately eliminate billions of people from the Earth and to enslave those who remain. We might be tempted to think this message is the rantings of a mad man, but coming from the former head scientist at Pfizer, which is one of the top Covid-vaccine manufacturers, it cannot be dismissed. Full story: redpilluniversity.org



    COVID Vaccine Necessity, Efficacy and Safety
    doctors4covidethics.com © 2021 all rights reserved

    Abstract: COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them.

    In short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe.

    The risk-benefit calculus is therefore clear: the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous. Actors authorising, coercing or administering experimental COVID-19 vaccination are exposing populations and patients to serious, unnecessary, and unjustified medical risks.

    1. The vaccines are unnecessary

    1. Multiple lines of research indicate that immunocompetent people display "robust" and lasting cellular (T cell) immunity to SARS-CoV viruses [1], including SARS-CoV-2 and its variants [2]. T cell protection stems not only from exposure to SARS-CoV-2 itself, but from cross-reactive immunity following previous exposure to common cold coronaviruses [1,3–10]. Such immunity was detectable after infections up to 17 years prior [1,3]. Therefore, immunocompetent people do not need vaccination against SARS-Cov-2.

    2. Natural T-Cell immunity provides stronger and more comprehensive protection against all SARS-CoV-2 strains than vaccines, because naturally primed immunity recognises multiple virus epitopes and costimulatory signals, not merely a single (spike) protein. Thus, immunocompetent people are better protected against SARS-CoV-2 and any variants that may arise by their own immunity than by the current crop of vaccines.

    3. The vaccines have been touted as a means to prevent asymptomatic infection [11], and by extension "asymptomatic transmission." However, "asymptomatic transmission" is an artefact of invalid and unreliable PCR test procedures and interpretations, leading to high false-positive rates [12–15]. Evidence indicates that PCR-positive, asymptomatic people are healthy false-positives, not carriers. A comprehensive study of 9,899,828 people in China found that asymptomatic individuals testing positive for COVID-19 never infected others [16]. In contrast, the papers cited by the Centre for Disease Control [17,18] to justify claims of asymptomatic transmission are based on hypothetical models, not empirical studies; they present assumptions and estimates rather than evidence. Preventing asymptomatic infection is not a viable rationale for promoting vaccination of the general population.

    4. In most countries, most people will now have immunity to SARS-CoV-2 [19]. Depending on their degree of previously acquired cross-immunity, they will have had no symptoms, mild and uncharacteristic symptoms, or more severe symptoms, possibly including anosmia (loss of sense of smell) or other somewhat characteristic signs of the COVID-19 disease. Regardless of disease severity, they will now have sufficient immunity to be protected from severe disease in the event of renewed exposure. This majority of the population will not benefit at all from being vaccinated.

    5. Population survival of COVID-19 exceeds 99.8% globally [20–22]. In countries which have been intensely infected over several months, less than 0.2% of the population have died and had their deaths classified as "with covid19".[20–22]. It is typically a mild to moderately severe illness. Therefore, the overwhelming majority of people are not at risk from COVID-19 and do not require vaccination for their own protection.

    6. In those susceptible to severe infection, Covid-19 is a treatable illness. A convergence of evidence indicates that early treatment with existing drugs reduces hospitalisation and mortality by ~85% and 75%, respectively [23–27]. These drugs include many tried and true antiinflammatory, antiviral, and anticoagulant medications, as well as monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. Industry and government decisions to sideline such proven treatments through selective research support [24], regulatory bias, and even outright sanctions against doctors daring to use such treatments on their own initiative have been out of step with existing laws, standard medical practice, and research; the legal requirement to consider real world evidence has fallen by the wayside [28]. The systematic denial and denigration of these effective therapies has underpinned the spurious justification for the emergency use authorisation of the vaccines, which requires that "no standard acceptable treatment is available" [29]. Plainly stated, vaccines are not necessary to prevent severe disease.

    2. The Vaccines Lack Efficacy

    1. At a mechanistic level, the concept of immunity to COVID-19 via antibody induction, as per COVID-19 vaccination, is medical nonsense. Airborne viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 enter the body via the airways and lungs, where antibody concentrations are too low to prevent infection. Vaccine-induced antibodies primarily circulate in the bloodstream, while concentrations on the mucous membranes of lungs and airways is low. Given that COVID-19 primarily spreads and causes disease by infecting these mucous membranes, vaccines miss the immunological mark. The documents submitted by the vaccine manufacturers to the various regulatory bodies contain no evidence that vaccination prevents airway infection, which would be crucial for breaking the chain of transmission. Thus, vaccines are immunologically inappropriate for COVID-19.

    2. Medium to long-term vaccine efficacy is unknown. Phase 3, medium term, 24-month trials will not be complete until 2023: There is no medium-term or long term longitudinal data regarding vaccine efficacy.

    3. Short term data has not established prevention of severe disease. The European Medicines Agency has noted of the Comirnaty (Pfizer mRNA) vaccine that severe COVID-19 cases "were rare in the study, and statistically certain conclusion cannot be drawn" from it [30]. Similarly, the Pfizer document submitted to the FDA [31] concludes that efficacy against mortality could not be demonstrated. Thus, the vaccines have not been shown to prevent death or severe disease even in the short term.

    4. The correlates of protection against COVID-19 are unknown. Researchers have not yet established how to measure protection against Covid-19. As a result, efficacy studies are stabbing around in the dark. After completion of Phase 1 and 2 studies, for instance, a paper in the journal Vaccine noted that "without understanding the correlates of protection, it is impossible to currently address questions regarding vaccine-associated protection, risk of COVID-19 reinfection, herd immunity, and the possibility of elimination of SARS-CoV-2 from the human population" [32]. Thus, Vaccine efficacy cannot be evaluated because we have not yet established how to measure it.

    3. The Vaccines are Dangerous

    1. Just as smoking could be and was predicted to cause lung cancer based on first principles, all gene-based vaccines can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders [33], based on their molecular mechanisms of action. Consistent with this, diseases of this kind have been observed across age groups, leading to temporary vaccine suspensions around the world: The vaccines are not safe.

    2. Contrary to claims that blood disorders post-vaccination are "rare," many common vaccine side effects (headaches, nausea, vomiting and haematoma-like "rashes" over the body) may indicate thrombosis and other severe abnormalities. Moreover, vaccine-induced diffuse micro-thromboses in the lungs can mimic pneumonia and may be misdiagnosed as COVID-19. Clotting events currently receiving media attention are likely just the "tip of a huge iceberg" [34]: The vaccines are not safe.

    3. Due to immunological priming, risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure. Over time, whether months or years [35], this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.

    4. Since vaccine roll-out, COVID-19 incidence has risen in numerous areas with high vaccination rates [36–38]. Furthermore, multiple series of COVID-19 fatalities have occurred shortly after the onset vaccinations in senior homes [39,40]. These cases may have been due not only to antibody-dependent enhancement but also to a general immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which is suggested by the increased occurrence of Herpes zoster in certain patients [41]. Immunosuppression may have caused a previously asymptomatic infection to become clinically manifest. Regardless of the exact mechanism responsible for these reported deaths, we must expect that the vaccines will increase rather than decrease lethality of COVID-19: The vaccines are not safe.

    5. The vaccines are experimental by definition. They will remain in Phase 3 trials until 2023. Recipients are human subjects entitled to free informed consent under Nuremberg and other protections, including the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe's resolution 2361 [42] and the FDA's terms of emergency use authorisation [29]. With respect to safety data from Phase 1 and 2 trials, in spite of initially large sample sizes the journal Vaccine reports that, "the vaccination strategy chosen for further development may have only been given to as few as 12 participants" [32]. With such extremely small sample sizes, the journal notes that, "larger Phase 3 studies conducted over longer periods of time will be necessary" to establish safety. The risks that remain to be evaluated in Phase 3 trials into 2023, with entire populations as subjects, include not only thrombosis and bleeding abnormalities, but other autoimmune responses, allergic reactions, unknown tropisms (tissue destinations) of lipid nanoparticles [35], antibody-dependent enhancement [43–46] and the impact of rushed, questionably executed, poorly regulated [47] and reportedly inconsistent manufacturing methods, conferring risks of potentially harmful impurities such as uncontrolled DNA residues [48]. The vaccines are not safe, either for recipients or for those who use them or authorise their use.

    6. Initial experience might suggest that the adenovirus-derived vaccines (AstraZeneca/Johnson & Johnson) cause graver adverse effects than the mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna) vaccines. However, upon repeated injection, the former will soon induce antibodies against the proteins of the adenovirus vector. These antibodies will then neutralize most of the vaccine virus particles and cause their disposal before they can infect any cells, thereby limiting the intensity of tissue damage.

    In contrast, in the mRNA vaccines, there is no protein antigen for the antibodies to recognize. Thus, regardless of the existing degree of immunity, the vaccine mRNA is going to reach its target—the body cells. These will then express the spike protein and subsequently suffer the full onslaught of the immune system. With the mRNA vaccines, the risk of severe adverse events is virtually guaranteed to increase with every successive injection. In the long term, they are therefore even more dangerous than the vector vaccines. Their apparent preferment over the latter is concerning in the highest degree: These vaccines are not safe.

    4. Ethics and Legal Points to Consider

    1. Conflicts of interest abound in the scientific literature and within organisations that recommend and promote vaccines, while demonising alternate strategies (reliance on natural immunity and early treatment). Authorities, doctors and medical personnel need to protect themselves by evaluating the sources of their information for conflicts of interest extremely closely.

    2. Authorities, doctors and medical personnel need to be similarly careful not to ignore the credible and independent literature on vaccine necessity, safety and efficacy, given the foreseeable mass deaths and harms that must be expected unless the vaccination campaign is stopped.

    3. Vaccine manufacturers have exempted themselves from legal liability for adverse events for a reason. When vaccine deaths and harms occur, liability will fall to those responsible for the vaccines' authorisation, administration and/or coercion via vaccine passports, none of which can be justified on a sober, evidence-based risk-benefit analysis.

    4. All political, regulatory and medical actors involved in COVID-19 vaccination should familiarise themselves with the Nuremberg code and other legal provisions in order to protect themselves.

    References

    1. Le Bert, N. et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457-462
    2. Tarke, A. et al. (2021) Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. bioRxiv -:x-x
    3. Duke-NUS Medical School. (2020) Scientists uncover SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in recovered COVID-19 and SARS patients.
    4. Beasley, D. (2020) Scientists focus on how immune system T cells fight coronavirus in absence of antibodies.
    5. Bozkus, C.C. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells without antibodies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20:463
    6. Grifoni, A. et al. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489-1501.e15
    7. Mateus, J. et al. (2020) Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans. Science 370:89-94
    8. McCurry-Schmidt, M. (2020) Exposure to common cold coronaviruses can teach the immune system to recognize SARS-CoV-2.
    9. Palmer, S. et al. (2021) COVID-19 hospitalization rates rise exponentially with age, inversely proportional to thymic T-cell production. J. R. Soc. Interface 18:20200982
    10. Sekine, T. et al. (2020) Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell 183:158-168.e14
    11. Drake, J. (2021) Now We Know: Covid-19 Vaccines Prevent Asymptomatic Infection, Too.
    12. Bossuyt, P.M. (2020) Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challenges. Journal of clinical epidemiology 126:172-176
    13. Jefferson, T. et al. (2020) Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectivity assessment. Systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. ciaa1764:x-x
    14. Borger, P. et al. (2020) External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
    15. Mandavilli, A. (2020) Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn't Be.
    16. Cao, S. et al. (2020) Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China. Nat. Commun. 11:5917
    17. Moghadas, S.M. et al. (2020) The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117:17513-17515
    18. Johansson, M.A. et al. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms. JAMA network open 4:e2035057
    19. Yeadon, M. (2020) What SAGE got wrong.
    20. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2020) Global perspective of COVID?19 epidemiology for a full?cycle pandemic. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50:x-x
    21. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2021) Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID?19: An overview of systematic evaluations. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. -:x-x
    22. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2020) Infection fatality rate of Covid-19 inferred from seroprevalence data. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation.
    23. Orient, J. et al. (2020) A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.
    24. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2020) Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 21:517-530
    25. Procter, B.C. et al. (2021) Early Ambulatory Multidrug Therapy Reduces Hospitalization and Death in High-Risk Patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). International journal of innovative research in medical science 6:219-221
    26. McCullough, P.A. et al. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16-22
    27. Covid Analysis. (2020) Real-time database and meta analysis of 588 COVID-19 studies.
    28. Hirschhorn, J.S. (2021) COVID scandal: Feds ignored 2016 law requiring use of real world evidence.
    29. US Food and Drug Administration. (1998) Emergency Use of an Investigational Drug or Biologic: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators.
    30. European Medicines Agency. (2021) EMA assessment report: Comirnaty.
    31. US Food and Drug Administration. (2020) FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
    32. Giurgea, L.T. and Memoli, M.J. (2020) Navigating the Quagmire: Comparison and Interpretation of COVID-19 Vaccine Phase 1/2 Clinical Trials. Vaccines 8:746
    33. Bhakdi, S. et al. (2021) Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns.
    34. Bhakdi, S. (2021) Rebuttal letter to European Medicines Agency from Doctors for Covid Ethics, April 1, 2021.
    35. Ulm, J.W. (2020) Rapid response to: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren't designed to tell us.
    36. Reimann, N. (2021) Covid Spiking In Over A Dozen States—Most With High Vaccination Rates.
    37. Meredith, S. (2021) Chile has one of the world’s best vaccination rates. Covid is surging there anyway.
    38. Bhuyan, A. (2021) Covid-19: India sees new spike in cases despite vaccine rollout. BMJ 372:n854
    39. Morrissey, K. (2021) Open letter to Dr. Karina Butler.
    40. UK Medical Freedom Alliance. (2021) Open Letter from the UK Medical Freedom Alliance: Urgent warning re Covid-19 vaccine-related deaths in the elderly and Care Homes.
    41. Furer, V. et al. (2021) Herpes zoster following BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a case series. Rheumatology -:x-x
    42. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2021) Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations.
    43. Tseng, C. et al. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421
    44. Bolles, M. et al. (2011) A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 85:12201-15
    45. Weingartl, H. et al. (2004) Immunization with modified vaccinia virus Ankara-based recombinant vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome is associated with enhanced hepatitis in ferrets. J. Virol. 78:12672-6
    46. Czub, M. et al. (2005) Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara based recombinant SARS vaccine in ferrets. Vaccine 23:2273-9
    47. Tinari, S. (2021) The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. BMJ 372:n627
    48. German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee. (2021) Interview with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krüger.



    Fear is Contageous and used to Control You
    By Dr. Joseph Mercola © 2021 all rights reserved

    June 18, 2021 — In a newly released book, members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior, a subcommittee that advises the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies in the U.K., admit government is using fear to control and manipulate the population.

    SPI-B, which advocated for the use of fear messaging, now says it was unethical, totalitarian and a regrettable mistake. Aside from the barrage of bad-news-only data—which was heavily manipulated in a variety of ways—fear and anxiety are also generated by keeping you confused.

    Giving out contradictory recommendations is done on purpose, to keep you psychologically vulnerable. By layering confusion and uncertainty on top of fear, you can bring an individual to a state in which they can no longer think rationally. Once driven into an illogical state, you are easily manipulated.

    Government's reliance on behavioral psychology didn't just happen as a result of the pandemic. These tactics have been used for years, and are increasing. Governments are using fear to control and manipulate their citizens. That has now been admitted by members of the (SPI-B). And they should know, because they advocated for it, and now say it was a regrettable mistake. As reported by The Telegraph, May 14, 2021:1

    "Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people's behavior during the COVID pandemic have admitted its work was 'unethical' and 'totalitarian.' Members of the (SPI-B) expressed regret about the tactics in a new book about the role of psychology in the Government's COVID-19 response. SPI-B warned in March last year that ministers needed to increase 'the perceived level of personal threat' from COVID-19 because 'a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.'

    Gavin Morgan, a psychologist on the team, said: 'Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It's not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people."


    Psychological Warfare is Real

    The Telegraph quotes several of the SPI-B members, all of whom are also quoted in the newly released book, "A State of Fear: How the UK Government Weaponised Fear During the Covid-19 Pandemic," written by Laura Dodsworth:2

    "One SPI-B scientist told Ms Dodsworth: 'In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn't want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian.

    The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It's been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared. . .

    One warned that 'people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn't happen otherwise . . . We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in' . . .

    Another member of SPI-B said they were 'stunned by the weaponization of behavioral psychology' during the pandemic, and that 'psychologists didn't seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative. They have too much power and it intoxicates them.'

    Steve Baker, the deputy chairman of the COVID Recovery Group of Tory MPs, said: 'If it is true that the state took the decision to terrify the public to get compliance with rules, that raises extremely serious questions about the type of society we want to become. If we're being really honest, do I fear that government policy today is playing into the roots of totalitarianism? Yes, of course it is.'"


    The Manufacture of Fear

    For nearly a year and a half, governments around the world, with few exceptions, have fed their citizens a steady diet of frightening news. For months on end, you couldn't turn on the television without facing a tickertape detailing the number of hospitalizations and deaths.

    Even when it became clear that people weren't really dying in excessive numbers, the mainstream media fed us continuous updates on the growing number of "cases," without ever putting such figures into context or explaining that the vast majority were false positives.

    People don't enjoy being hoodwinked and they don't want to live in a state of fear. We maybe need to be a bit bolder about standing up more quickly when something is not right. ~ Laura Dodsworth Information that would have balanced out the bad news—such as recovery rates and just how many so-called "cases" actually weren't, because they never had a single symptom—were censored and suppressed.

    They also refused to put any of the data into context, such as reviewing whether the death toll actually differed significantly from previous years. Instead, each new case was treated as an emergency and a sign of catastrophic doom.


    Don't be confused—Contradiction is a Warfare Tactic

    Aside from the barrage of bad-news-only data—which, by the way, was heavily manipulated in a variety of ways—fear and anxiety are also generated by keeping you confused. According to Dodsworth, giving out contradictory recommendations and vague instructions is being done intentionally, to keep you psychologically vulnerable.

    "When you create a state of confusion, people become ever more reliant on the messaging. Instead of feeling confident about making decisions, they end up waiting for instructions from the Government," she said in a May 20, 2021, interview on the Planet Normal podcast.3

    An example provided by Dodsworth are the pandemic measures implemented over Christmas 2020:

    "Family Christmases were on, then off, then back on, then off again. You have got someone tightening the screw, then loosening the screw, then tightening it again. It's like a torture scenario."

    But that's not all. As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Breggin, by layering confusion and uncertainty on top of fear, you can bring an individual to a state in which they can no longer think rationally. Once driven into an illogical state, they are easily manipulated. I have no doubt driving people into a state where logic and reason no longer registers is the whole point behind much of the conflicting information we're given.


    The Fear Factory

    In her book, Dodsworth details a number of branches of the British government that are using psychological warfare methods in their interaction with the public. In addition to the SPI-B, there's the:4

    Behavioral Insights team, the so-called "nudge unit," a semi-independent government body that applies "behavioral insights to inform policy, improve public services and deliver positive results for people and communities."5 This team also advises foreign nations.

    Home Office's Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU), which is part of the U.K.'s Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism, advises front groups disguised as public "grassroots" organizations on how to "covertly engineer the thoughts of people."

    Rapid Response Unit, launched in 2018, operates across the British Cabinet Office and the Prime Minister's office (colloquially known as "Number 10" as in the physical address, 10 Downing Street in London) to "counter misinformation and disinformation." They also work with the National Security Communications Team during crises to ensure "official information" gets maximum visibility.6

    Counter Disinformation Cell, which is part of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. Both monitor social media and combat "fake news" about science in general and COVID-19 in particular, with "fake news" being anything that contradicts the World Health Organization's guidance.7

    Government Communications Headquarters (QCHQ), an intelligence and security organization that provides information to the U.K. government and the armed forces. According to Dodsworth, QCHQ personnel, and even members of the 77th Brigade, have been enlisted as so-called sockpuppets and trolls to combat anti-vaccine and anti-lockdown messaging on social media.

    According to Dodsworth, there are many others. In her book, she claims at least 10 different government departments in the U.K. are working with "behavioral insights teams" to manipulate the public.


    We're just Seeing It Now

    Importantly, government's reliance on behavioral psychology didn't just happen as a result of the pandemic. These tactics have been used for years, for myriad PR purposes, and while the pandemic may be winding down, Dodsworth warns that more and more behavioral scientists are being hired:8

    "It's growing and growing. Right now, I feel we are in a maelstrom of nudge," she says. "In the past, there have been calls to consult the public on the use of behavioral psychology, and those calls have come from the behavioral scientists themselves. And yet it hasn't happened. We haven't yet been consulted on the use of subconscious techniques which effectively strip away our choices . . .

    I fervently hope this book ['The State of Fear'] is actually going to inspire a much-needed conversation about the use of fear, not just in the epidemic, but the way we use behavioral psychology overall.

    It's not just a genie that has been let out the bottle. It's like we've unleashed a Hydra and you can keep chopping its head off, but they keep employing more of these behavioral scientists throughout different government departments. It's very much how the Government now does business. It's the business of fear . . .

    I think ultimately people don't want to be manipulated. People don't enjoy being hoodwinked and they don't want to live in a state of fear. We maybe need to be a bit bolder about standing up more quickly when "something is not right."


    Fear is Contagious

    Fear has long been the tool of tyrants. It's profoundly effective, in part because it spreads from person to person, just like a virus. The contagion of fear is the topic of the Nova "Gross Science" video, originally aired in mid-February 2017. Among animals, emotional distress responses are telegraphed through pheromones emitted through various bodily secretions such as sweat and saliva.

    As explained in the video, when encountering what is perceived as a serious threat, animals with strong social structures, such as bees and ants, will release alarm pheromone. The scent attracts other members of the hive or colony to collectively address the threat.

    Humans appear to have a very similar capability. When scared or stressed, humans produce chemosignals, and while you may not consciously recognize the smell of fear or stress, it can have a subconscious impact, making you feel afraid or stressed too.

    Humans also tend to mimic the feelings of those around us, and this is yet another way through which an emotion can spread like wildfire through a community or an entire nation—for better or worse. Behavioral psychologists refer to this as "emotional contagion," and it works both positive and negative emotions.

    For example, if you're greeted by a smile when meeting someone, you're likely to smile back, mimicking their facial expression and behavior. If someone looks at you with an angry scowl, you're likely to suddenly feel angry too, even if you weren't before and have no subjective reason to—other than that someone looked at you the "wrong" way.

    However, while both positive and negative emotions are contagious, certain emotions spread faster and easier than others. Research cited in the Nova report found that "high arousal" emotions such as awe (high-arousal positive emotion) and anger or anxiety (high-arousal negative emotion) are more "viral" than low-arousal emotions such as happiness or sadness.

    The Nova report also points out that researchers have been mining Twitter and other social media data to better understand how emotions are spread, and the types of messages that spread the fastest. However, they ignored the primary culprits, Google and Facebook both of which steal your private data and use it to manipulate your behavior.

    At the time, in 2017, they said this information was being harvested and used to develop ways to avoid public messaging that might incite mass panic. But the COVID-19 pandemic suggests the complete opposite. Clearly, behavioral experts have been busy developing ways to generate maximum fear, anxiety and panic.


    How to inoculate Yourself against Negative Contagion?

    At the end of the report, Nova cites research detailing three effective ways to "immunize" yourself against negative emotional contagions.

    Distract yourself from the source of the negative contagion—In the case of pandemic fearporn, that might entail not reading or listening to mainstream media news that for the past year have proven themselves incapable of levelheadedness.

    Project your own positive emotions back at the source of the negative contagion—If talking to someone who is fearful, they might end up "catching" your optimism rather than the other way around.

    Speak up—If someone is unwittingly spreading "negative vibes," telling them so might help them realize what they're doing. (This won't work if the source is knowingly and purposely spreading fear or anxiety though.)


    Pandemic of Panic

    In a recent Tweet,9 Ivor Cummins, a biochemical engineer who researches the root causes of chronic disease, shared a short video detailing the root cause of the panic pandemic. Why has the whole world seemingly gone mad from fear?

    As explained by Cummins, the outsized level of public fear is the result of a catastrophic feedback loop system where political and mainstream media drivers are pushing fear onto the public, and public fears are then feeding the media (fear sells) and pushing politicians to take action, which generates more fear messages. And so, round and round it goes.

    However, at a certain point, this engine of fear starts losing steam. To keep the pandemic pandemonium going, academics bearing doomsday predictions were brought in to scare politicians and provide more fearporn fodder for the media.

    Aiding the academic drivers are unelected, undemocratic organizations such as the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Big Pharma (just to name a few), all of which support these academic doomsday prophets from behind the scenes or openly promote them.

    All of the organizations Cummins mentions are part of a technocratic, unelected elite that are making decisions for the entire world. If we were to somehow shut down this secondary engine that feeds into the first, the global insanity would probably start to abate.

    The question is, can that be done? Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has likened our current predicament to "an apocalyptical battle,"10 as we're facing formidable undemocratic forces with seemingly unlimited financial resources, political influence and the ability to control the global landscape of communications.

    We're facing a globalist agenda that ultimately seeks to gain total control by stripping away human rights and the rights of countries, and they're using "biosecurity" as justification for it all.


    Exposing the Grand Plan

    As explained by journalist James Corbett in his October 16, 2020, Corbett Report,11 the Great Reset is a new "social contract" that ties every person to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, and a social credit ID that will end up dictating every facet of your life.

    It's about getting rid of capitalism and free enterprise, and replacing them with "sustainable development" and "stakeholder capitalism"—terms that belie their nefarious, antihumanity intents. As noted in the book, "Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order":12

    ". . . Sustainable Development is Technocracy . . . The Sustainable Development movement has taken careful steps to conceal its true identity, strategy and purpose, but once the veil is lifted, you will never see it any other way. Once its strategy is unmasked, everything else will start to make sense."

    In her blog post "The Great Reset for Dummies," journalist Tessa Lena summarizes the purpose behind the call for a global "reset":13

    "The mathematical reason for the Great Reset is that thanks to technology, the planet has gotten small, and the infinite expansion economic model is bust—but obviously, the super wealthy want to continue staying super wealthy, and so they need a miracle, another bubble, plus a surgically precise system for managing what they perceive as 'their limited resources.'

    Thus, they desperately want a bubble providing new growth out of thin air—literally—while simultaneously they seek to tighten the peasants' belts, an effort that starts with 'behavioral modification,' a.k.a. resetting the western peasants' sense of entitlement to high life standards and liberties . . . The practical aim of the Great Reset is to fundamentally restructure the world's economy and geopolitical relations based on two assumptions:

    One, that every element of nature and every life form is a part of the global inventory (managed by the allegedly benevolent state, which, in turn, is owned by several suddenly benevolent wealthy people, via technology).

    And two, that all inventory needs to be strictly accounted for: be registered in a central database, be readable by a scanner and easily ID'ed, and be managed by AI, using the latest 'science.'


    The goal is to count and then efficiently manage and control all resources, including people, on an unprecedented scale, with unprecedented digital . . . precision—all while the masters keep indulging, enjoying vast patches of conserved nature, free of unnecessary sovereign peasants and their unpredictability."

    These new global "assets" can also be turned into brand-new financial instruments that can then be traded. For example, Zero-Budget Natural Farming is now being introduced in India. This is a brand-new concept of farming in which farmers must trade the carbon rate in their soil on the global market if they want to make a living. They'll get no money at all for the crops they actually grow.


    The Pandemic has been a Psychological Operation

    There's not a single area of life that is left out of this Great Reset plan. The planned reform will affect everything from government, energy and finance to food, medicine, real estate, policing and even how we interact with our fellow human beings in general.

    It goes without saying that to radically transform every last part of society has its challenges. No person in their right mind would agree to it if aware of the details of the whole plan. So, to roll this out, they had to use psychological manipulation, and fear is the most effective tool for inducing compliance there is.

    The following graphic illustrates the central role of fearmongering for the successful rollout of the Great Reset.

    Tecnnocracy & the Great Reset

    Social Engineering is central to Technocratic Rule

    Technocracy is inherently a technological society run through social engineering. Fear is but one manipulation tool. The focus on "science" is another. Anytime someone dissents, they're simply accused of being "anti-science," and any science that conflicts with the status quo is declared "debunked science."

    The only science that matters is whatever the technocrats deem to be true, no matter how much evidence there is against it. We've seen this first-hand during this pandemic, as Big Tech has censored and banned anything going against the opinions of the WHO, which is just another cog in the technocratic machine.

    If we allow this censorship to continue, the end result will be nothing short of devastating. So, we simply must keep pushing for transparency, truth, medical freedom, personal liberty and the right to privacy.

    Recognizing that the fear we feel has been carefully manufactured can help free us from its grip, and once we—en masse—no longer believe the lies being put before us, the engine driving the fear and panic will eventually run out of steam. nl1158.htm


    Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
    Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

    Bible Believers' Church
    Currabubula NSW
    Australia 2342
     
    e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers' Website
    PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
    Subscribe click Unsubscribe click