Bible Believers' Newsletter 278
"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; may He bless our fellowship around His revealed Word.
Brother Branham taught that the world is going insane, or as the pagans understood, "Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad." One need only consider the wicked coup in progress by the 'hidden hand' behind the transparently insane actions of 'front' men like Bush II, Blair and Howard to recognize God has lifted His protective hand from the nominally Christian Gentiles of Adam's fallen race since they put Him from their minds to follow like fools, that which is right in their own eyes (Proverbs 12:15; Luke 17:28; Romans 1:16-32; II Timothy 3-4). A sign we are at the end of time!
Jesus prophesied this apostasy with its attendant insanity. "Because you say, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and know not that you are wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked" (Revelation 3:17). A perfect portrait of America and the rest of the once Christian world that is deluded and clinically insane!
Paul forewarned, "With all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them who perish because they received not the love of the truth [or rejected the faith] that they might be saved, God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie: that they all might be damned who believed not the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness" (II Thessalonians 2:10-12).
This insanity infecting the world is a largely "Jewish" contagion whose occult roots stem from Satan's Babylonian Talmud and Kabala which Jesus said, "make the Word of God of no effect".
While God's people always work openly, Satan's crowd always hides behind another name and work under a different occupation. At this time they are hiding behind the 'front' of the United States and operating (as usual) at taxpayer expense. Along with the (once) Protestant churches the United States of America is the image to the Roman Beast. Those with Spiritual eyes will be aware of the simmering cauldron of intolerance between the Judaeo-Christian religious mongrel and ungodly Islam being brought to the boil as World War III shifts into a higher gear. Soon thereafter they will adopt the 'front' of the Roman Catholic church to bring a pseudo peace and rule a new world order under the cruel hand of their US colonial troops. Next they will employ the 'front' of China and then Russia to destroy the United States. Finally they propose to destroy and supplant Communism, nihilism, atheism and all religions with the pure Luciferian worship.
The Destroyers have a king over them whose Hebrew name Abaddon, means 'Destroyer.' He is the angel of the bottomless pit commonly known as Satan, who with his vicarious natural offspring conquered the children of Israel by assimilation, miscegenation and the insanity of apostasy, eventually persuading them to murder Messiah (Genesis 27:39-41). Unable to destroy the risen Lord, they attempted to destroy the influence of His Word by rebadging Babylonian paganism as the Roman Catholic system of false worship. With his natural and spiritual offspring, Satan employed Catholicism to blind the world over almost one thousand years of Dark Ages. During the Reformation of the Roman Catholic system of worship they arose behind the 'fronts' of Protestantism, which they infiltrated, Jesuitism and Freemasonry, which they established (Revelation 9:1-11).
Luther recognized the work of these demons. The identity of their initial host as indicated by the use of the Hebrew and Greek tongues is "destruction" and "destroyer." Luther warned these self-styled "Jews" are destroyers of Christianity and Christians which is commanded of them by the Talmud. "He did not call them Abraham's children, but a "brood of vipers" (Matthew 3:7). Oh, that was too insulting for the noble blood and race of Israel, and they declared, "He has a demon" (Matthew 11:18). Our Lord called them a "brood of vipers" then in John 8[:39, 44] He stated: "If you were Abraham's children you would do what Abraham did. . . You are of your father the Devil." It was intolerable to them to hear that they were not Abraham's but the Devil's children, nor can they bear to hear this today. . . Such a desperate, thoroughly evil, poisonous and devilish lot are these Jews, who for these fourteen hundred years have been and still are our plague, our pestilence, and our misfortune."
Like father, like son. Scripture does not play with words. Whatever is in the Record is there for the anointed eyes to see. It is there for a purpose. It is for the admonition of those with Spiritual eyes (I Corinthians 2:6-16; Revelation 3:18).
Presently they are bleeding their US 'front' as previously they bled their British 'front,' of all godliness, character, morality, honesty, industry, faithfulness and the fruits of the Spirit. They plan to outlaw and destroy Christianity and all religions soon after World War III, and bring every man against his brother in a world-wide revolution, more vicious and insane than their French Revolutions. "We Jews, we are the Destroyers and will remain the Destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own" (Maurice Samuels, You Gentiles, p. 155; Benjamin Franklin).
Our guest contributor John Kaminski is a writer whose essay "America's Autopsy Report" is scheduled for publication by Dandelion Books. He writes, ". . . the biggest story of the new century . . . is the ascendance of China, backed by Israel and the premeditated destruction of the United States by multinational corporate murderers" (John Kaminski, A Call for Mass Meetings Everywhere on 9/11/2003, June 20, 2003). This was the method the "Jews" employed to destroy Germany until Hitler was elected, Great Britain, South Africa, Russia (the second time), Australia, etc., Behind the scenes of all major national and corporate crashes lurk "the Destroyers".
Having destroyed Iraq from behind the 'front' of three reprobate, once Christian nations, "British and American intelligence and special forces have been put on alert for a conflict with Iran within the next 12 months . . ." based upon another lying pretext like that employed to justify the unwarranted and illegal invasion, theft and occupation of sovereign Afghanistan and Iraq (The Evening Standard).
A Sunni Muslim prayer leader charged Friday June 20 that US forces occupying Iraq were opening up the country to 'the Jews' and chided Iraqis he said were working as 'brokers' for the Jewish infiltrators. 'The liberation of which they spoke boils down to liberating Iraq from its Arab Muslim people . . . so that the Jews can enter it,' Sheikh Mahmud Khalaf told the faithful during weekly Muslim prayers in Baghdad's Sheikh Abdul Kader al-Kilani mosque. 'The Jews, civilian and military people, are now entering Iraq . . . buying property, factories and companies while Iraqis work for them as brokers and guides'. . .
On July 16, 1996, the US Senate passed sanctions against Iran and Libya. With their continued sanctions against the innocent civilians of Iraq, and now Iran, the US was even then building to a confrontation with the militant Islamic community. As Ronald W. Lewis wrote in the November, 1996 edition of Air Forces Monthly:
". . . the West—and especially the US—has been exporting terrorism in the form of economic sanctions, assassinations, coups, death-squads, and covert/overt wars in almost every part of the world since the beginning of the century.
Support in the form of arms and drugs flowed from Pakistan and Afghanistan to militant Islamic groups around the world, aided by the CIA, rogue intelligence officers, and senior US officials in for their piece of the action—just as Oliver North's "Enterprise" would do with the Contras in Nicaragua. In fact, many of the same individuals were involved" (David Hoffman, The Oklahoma City Bombing and The Politics of Terror).
Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, Arab lands were divided by the 'hidden hand' as a future trigger for their planned World War III. The partition of India in 1948, separating Pakistan and Bangladesh as Muslim homelands created another trigger. Muslim Indonesia was created by the CIA, Rockefeller and their local strongman-dictator—another trigger to be squeezed in World War III.
"No modern political ruling group has successfully controlled its constituency after failing to sustain the continuing credibility of an external threat of war." Despite evidence that they are liars, the 'Coalition of the Willing' (so-called) is sparing no effort to "sustain the credibility of an external threat of war," including draconian legislation to "successfully control its constituency." Report from Iron Mountain states: "War supplies the basis for the general acceptance of political authority" which "has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions," and "ensured the subordination of the citizen to the state." As I write, the Australian government has resumed its push for detention without trial. Religion, taxation, disease, illegal drugs, alcohol, education, public entertainments and sports spectaculars, party politics, immigration, phony 'terrorist organizations' and lies are all employed to control citizens. If only they knew "it is all in the mind" by carefully manicured perception, citizens could call their bluff.
Martin-Baro stressed several relevant points in The Psychological Consequences of Political Terror, a speech delivered in California, November, 1989. "First, the most significant form of terrorism, by a large measure, is state terrorism—that is, terrorizing the whole population through systematic actions carried out by the forces of the state. Second, such terrorism is an essential part of a government-imposed sociopolitical project designed for the needs of the privileged".
As professor and dissident intellectual Noam Chomsky writes: Over the last ten years, every year or two some major monster is constructed that we have to defend ourselves against. There used to be one that was always available: the Russians. But they're losing their attractiveness as an enemy, and it's getting harder and harder to use that one, so some new ones have to be conjured up. They've got to keep coming up, one after another. You frighten the population, terrorize them, intimidate them. That's one of the ways in which you can keep the bewildered herd from paying attention to what's really going on around them, keep them diverted and controlled. . . (Noam Chomsky, Alternative Press Review, Fall, 1993).
When the Khazar George Bush II warned Europe on anti-Semitism one reader observed, today you might well see it as your public duty to criticize Jews whose hatred for Christianity and Jesus Christ has compelled them to institute policies of genocide which are in force at all times:
"Jews cannot tolerate and cannot allow their organized endeavors to be examined and discussed in any public forum. This is made obvious by their perennial and unremitting effort to criminalize criticism of themselves. Why is it so important to them to intimidate the public into silence by the fear of being transformed from citizen into criminal if they criticize Jews? The answer to that question is easy to find. All a reasonably intelligent, thinking person has to do is to look at the devastation the Jews have imposed upon societies of White people—whom the Jews, of course, see as their principal and eternal enemy (Genesis 3:15). If he is at all diligent, the thinking observer will see that their ultimate objective is the destruction of traditional, predominately white (once) Christian society, which is a complete explanation of the need for us to criticize the Jews, is it not?" (The White Holocaust toogoodreports.com).
These Luciferians are awaiting instructions and the most auspicious astrological time to advance plans for one world government by an attack upon Iran, Syria, Korea, Burma, Pakistan, or some other sovereign nation state in this simmering World War III. In the mean time America is buying-off banana republics to ensure her Administration is not arraigned for war crimes.
The US presently has over 10,500 nuclear weapons and is rapidly manufacturing more (Los Angeles Times, April 23, 2003). One objective of the hidden hand is massive world depopulation and a return to serfdom. The civil war that has raged in the Congo over the past four years has resulted in loss of 3.3 million lives—more than in any other conflict since World War II yet there has been no mention of this in the controlled media because UN policy calls for severe depopulation of the Dark Continent.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whosoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Please confirm all things personally in your own Bible.
Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott
Canadian Leaders to propose Gay Marriage Law
Toronto, June 17, 2003 — The Canadian cabinet approved a new national policy today to open marriage to gay couples, paving the way for Canada to become the third country [after the Netherlands and Belgium] to allow same-sex unions.
"You have to look at history as an evolution of society," Prime Minister Jean Chretien told reporters after a meeting of his cabinet. "According to the interpretation of the courts these unions should be legal in Canada. We will ensure that our legislation includes and legally recognizes the union of same-sex couples". . . (New York Times).
Jesus was Gay—$51,000 says so
Brisbane, May 29, 2003 — Jesus was gay—the University of Queensland gave $51,000 of public money to a PhD student to reach that conclusion. Melbourne-based Rollan McCleary, who will today be awarded his doctorate, earned $17,000 a year to work on his three-year thesis on homosexual spirituality.
As well as his revelation about Christ, Dr. McCleary has also reached the conclusion that three—or possibly four—of Jesus's chosen disciples were also gay. . . he hopes to pursue postdoctoral studies with the aim of making gay spirituality a separate academic discipline. . .
He said Jesus' astrological chart, clues in the scriptures to which the churches had been blind and accurate biblical translations had all played a part in his conclusions. "The starting point is the matter of John, who always referred to himself as Jesus' beloved disciple," Dr. McCleary said. . .
"If you assume that Christ was incarnate, there are perfect theological and mystical reasons to point to his sexuality," Dr. McCleary said. Gay spirituality, he said, had begun with Christianity then fanned out to other religions such as Buddhism. An Anglican and a qualified reader of astrological charts, Dr. McCleary is open about being gay himself (Tess Livingston, Higher Education Editor, Courier Mail, 29 May 2003).
Comment: This disproves 'evolution,' and proves the Third Law of Thermodynamics is in force, showing that man is regressing and that homosexuality is an unnatural perversion.
Professor Countess' Response to 'Dr.' McCleary's Homosexual Theorizing
Response to Dr. Mc"GAY"cleary:
"Been there, done that" is a beginning response since other homosexuals with their idee fixe apologetic for AB-normal sexual activities have been attempting to "demonstrate" Jesus' sexual AB-normality for perhaps twenty plus years. [The NORM for the realm of Nature is male and female; the DEVIATION from the NORM is homosexual activity and the NORM is supported by the inherent [= natural] male+female conjugation wherein NEW births occur. Thus, to speak of the homosexual amongst homo sapiens is to speak about that which deviates FROM the normal—regardless what social-psycho arguments are put forth to TRANSMOGRIFY the AB-norm into the NORM.]
First, what McCleary has attempted is to RE-write New Testament History by eisegeting [= leading INTO] the Gospels what cannot be exegeted [= led OUT] of the texts.
Second, political types have eisegeted dogmatic Marxist political sentiments and theory; socialists similarly; Right-Wing types have done so as well. ["Left" and "Right-wing" are the two factions of the Illuminati's Hegelian dialectic—Ed.].
What then is remaining but for homosexuals—with an Evolutionary-Darwinist AB-normal "death-style" [since homosexual men live on average to less than 50, with heterosexual males into their 60s+]—to "FIND" within the textual corpus what is clearly eisegesis.
What next? Already, the Jacques Derrida "deconstructionists" innovators can find various "gender" and "racist" models in the NT Texts. Actually, when people like McCleary with their $$$ funding are given academic credit, they can "FIND" anything they want. For example, MORMONS have "found" Jesus to have been a polygamist, with John 2 and the Wedding at Cana [remember the water-into-wine miracle?] as [only] ONE of His marriages!!!
Third, now for the "nitty gritty" analysis.
1) One wonders if the Australian taxpayers require a graduate student to have expertise in NT Greek in order to write a thesis or dissertation in the field of New Testament Studies. I hope they make this demand, but I doubt it. For all I know, the Australian taxpayers might be funding medical doctoral studies wherein the students are NOT even required to become experts in physiology!!! So, perhaps someone "Down Under" will inform me if McCleary has spent years acquiring the 457 forms of the model verb luo and learning the 5,594 vocabulary entries in a lexicon for the Greek New Testament. I REALLY want to know.
2) Then one must ask if McCleary has considered that in Ancient Greek that there are at least three words for the ambiguous English "love." Their analysis may be found at hand in Richard Chenevix Trench's Synonyms of the New Testament and they are agape, eros, and philos. Agape is a highly rational attachment; eros is physical and erotic [Hey, wow, gee whiz! Erotic comes from the Greek eros and the deponent verb eraomai !!! Can you believe that?] And philos is rather ambiguous but may generally focus on a fondness or friendship sort of relationship.
3) Now, which of the above did our "golly, shucks, gee whiz" Australian budding-scholar McCleary FIND to be used with Jesus and with John as referenced to and elsewhere in the corpus of the Greek New Testament?
4) For McCleary who has been subsidized by the Australian taxpayers to FIND homosexuality in the GNT, John 21:20 seems to be a crux interpretatum, if I recall my Latin correctly. Here we read that Peter turned and sees "the disciple whom Jesus was loving." Surely, Mc observed the Imperfect Active Indicative Third Person Singular of agapao here [= egapa we might transliterate]. Surely, Mc observed that in St. Mark 1:11 that upon Jesus' baptism the Holy Spirit descended like a dove and a voice from Heaven thundered: "Thou art My beloved Son." AND, Mc must have noticed no agapetos here for Jesus, "beloved." HENCE, Mc must have inferred from usage that God the Father had a homosexual relationship or "lifestyle" with the Son as the Son did, according to Mc, with the disciple John.
5) Mc also must have examined other passages, for example, Romans 11:28, where St. Paul wrote that the Israelites were agapetoi by Jehovah-God. AND, just as surely, Mc must have written in his paper to the academics funded by the Australian taxpayers that the Israelites had a homosexual "lifestyle" going with JHWH-God over a many years period.
6) Quite logically, Mc must have LOVED St. John's Third Epistle where in verses 2, 5, and 11 he refers to the recipient of this brief letter as agapete [here the Vocative form of the adjective]. If we were to take Mc seriously at all about anything academic, we would conclude that the aged Apostle John, writing perhaps from Efes [the Turkish spelling of the Greek place name Ephesos [I visited Efes in June 1979] toward the end of the First Century AD, had a homosexual relationship going with the recipient of this Epistle. But, I must add, I have real problems with taking the Australian taxpayer supported McCleary seriously when he makes conclusions about exegesis and textual content.
7) I wonder if Mc has poured for hours over the decades in the standard lexica for Greek studies: Liddell-Scott-Jones or Arndt and Gingrich. The latter give under agapetos [the adjective "beloved"] that this term of endearment was common in the Homeric corpus. Golly!!! Now I must wonder if the putative blind slave or hostage omeros [=Homer] was a committed AB-normal type like Mc has "come out of the closet" to be known as. [I must also inquire what Mc had been DOING while IN that closet. Guess I am just curious].
As we say here in these United States, "the bottom line" is that McCleary exhibits the "warp and woof" [a fabric tech-term] of a WARPED and superficial approach to a discipline that ought ONLY to allow into its sanctuary those who are serious and profound. Mc's work actually points to his professors as having fundamental problems with FINDING students these days in the Island Continent of Australia. Perhaps the truly ABLE students in Greek and Text studies are at the Presbyterian seminary in Melbourne or the Presbyterian Theological school of Queensland University where I gave a lecture on the philology of bapto and baptizo in August 1988 when on a lecture tour of my book focusing on Greek and translation problems with the Jehovah's Witnesses' New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures [their 1951 publication]. And, by the way, my book is now in Polish, Russian, and Romanian and the English edition has sold over 6,000 copies—quite unusual for a highly technical work, but then certainly no match for McCleary's eventual tome on Jesus' homosexuality since the AB-normal male readership in Australia and the USA, and especially in the British Parliament!, will elect to buy it up with alacrity. [Their election to purchase it . . . will make my book pale into insignificance.]
Again, "the bottom line" is that McCleary can produce in Australia a thin thesis of toilet tissue strength content and thereby DEFAME the memory of the dead Jesus [for those who do not accept the Resurrection], but a Dr. Frederick Toben and others cannot produce solid scientific-historiography about the Jewish Holocaust Story that contravenes the politically-correct dogma of homicidal gassing chambers without running the risk of a Jeremy Jones and certain academic flaks and flakes taking him to court and insisting that he has DEFAMED the memory of dead, holocausted "Jews."
Golly, shucks, gee whiz! The memory of Jews at room temperature is MORE important, MORE sacred than a deceased Jesus Christ or John or Paul or Matthew and the like!!!
"The bottom line" is that Australian academia and government are "ripping off" the taxpayers to pay for McCleary's food and rent and petrol and books and tuition, and for Holocaust Memorials and Centers and Celebrations.
As a simple American, I wonder: Why do the Australian taxpayers continue to do this?
Robert H. Countess, Ph.D. Ancient Greek [email protected] 28755
Sagewood Circle
Toney, AL 35773 USA
Phone: (256) 232-4940 Cell: (256) 653-7598
Fax: (256) 232-4940).
Danger in the Stars for Young Catholics
Horoscopes are a greater danger to young Catholics than attacks on their faith by science, according to Sydney Archbishop George Pell.
In a pastoral letter on Christian leadership, Dr. Pell also said: "Unless people stand for something, they will fall for anything." Dr. Pell warned that if Christianity declined radically in Australia, though there was evidence that the rise in unbelief had leveled off, most people would not turn to science and reason. "They will be superstitious, choosing bits and pieces from a mishmash of the 'great religious traditions' and New Age recipes. Think of the tens of thousands of Australians who look at their horoscopes each day to read their future in the stars. Some of them are even serious about this neo-pagan nonsense."
Episcopal Vicar of Religious Education in Melbourne, Monsignor Peter Elliott, said some Catholics read horoscopes for fun, "but there are a lot of other people who take it deadly seriously, and even model their lives and practices on the stars." The problem was increasingly widespread because the New Age movement had become heavily commercialized, particularly the psychics industry. Monsignor Elliott said the Catholic catechism explicitly rejected horoscopes, astrology, palm reading, and interpretation of omens, clairvoyants and mediums. The catechism says: "These all conceal a desire for power over time, history and in the last analysis other human beings." Monsignor Elliott said three forces were battling with the church for people's souls: the New Age movement, a revival of atheistic science worship [Ed: 'scientism'] and nihilistic postmodern deconstructionism. He cited as dangerous reiki healing with its emphasis on spirit guides, Wicca or modern-day witchcraft, and ecofeminism. "Some naive Catholics think they can blend that with Christianity, but the two are absolutely incompatible." Full story: theage.com.au
Jews against Zionism: The Hidden Protest
June 11, 2003 — Massive Media Cover-up! Jews against Zionism: The Hidden Protest Anti-Zionist orthodox Jews protest against Israel:
"On Sunday, June 1, 2003 at 5th Ave. and 59th St. in Manhattan, NYC a group of anti-Zionist Jews demonstrated against Zionism and the Zionist State celebrated by marchers in the so-called Israel Day Parade." As improbable as it may seem to the uninformed, there are a significant number of Jews in the United States, Great Britain, Israel and elsewhere who oppose Zionism, Zionist oppression of the Palestinians and even the very existence of the State of Israel itself!
We say hidden protest because this tangible opposition has been totally ignored by the news departments of the major television and radio networks, magazines and newspapers (in the last source, some papers, such as The New York Times, may make very brief mention of the protests, but even then they bury articles far enough away from the front page that they are less likely to be seen).
Jews: Zionism is cause of instability in the world "The Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews will proclaim their loyalty to pure Judaism and their opposition to Zionist heresy, which violates every principle of the Jewish religion. These people believe that the idolatrous Zionist ideology has nothing to do with Orthodox Jews, and that Jews are obligated by Judaism to live in peace and harmony with all other nations throughout the world, including Palestinian natives of course." According to one website, the reasoning behind the opposition is Zionism's disobedience to God's plan. Full story: realnews247.com
Hillary Clinton
Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black panther named . . . Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him.
When they tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head. Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Connecticut.
Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers was still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard, and became good friends with none other than Al Gore.
He later became an assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't that something? As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head, and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only in America!
Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board.
How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial.
One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the US Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.
O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? No, neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale University at the time. She is now known as "The smartest woman in the world." She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of New York—our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.
And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story".
Hillary Convinced Bill to Bomb Serbia
Phoenix, June 12, 2003 — Remember the cover story "Madeleine's War" from a May 1999 Time Magazine edition? As you may recall, a popular opinion at the time was that Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton's secretary of state, was the person the most responsible for the bombing of Serbia four years ago.
Well, think again. Without trying to exonerate or excuse Clinton's war-mongering secretary of state whose Serbo-phobia has been well documented and demonstrated, we want you to know that there may have been another woman who deserves at least part of the credit—Hillary Clinton.
The avalanche of publicity brought on by Hillary Clinton's new book, released this week, also washed up in our e-mail tray, a message from a reader referencing an old interview that has suddenly become very topical. Michael Savage, a national radio host, interviewed Gail Sheehy, author of a flattering Hillary biography, "Hillary's Choice," on December 18, 1999. Sheehy claimed in her book that it was Hillary, not "Madam Halfbright," who convinced Bill to bomb Serbia. So Savage took the author to task over that and the bogus "intelligence" upon which this bombing was "justified" to the American public. [If this also brings to mind the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) "intelligence" that George W. Bush used to justify his devastation of yet another country, we won't be surprised].
Meanwhile, back to Kosovo and Serbia; check out the following excerpt from the Savage interview if you want to see how Savage savaged this Hillary fan. Full story: truthinmedia.org
Trashing the Constitution
In his introduction to an address presented by Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Esq., to the Rotary Club of New York on March 25th, 2003 at the Princeton Club, New York, NY entitled "Trashing the Constitution: How misconstruction of the monetary powers and disabilities subverted the Founding Fathers' intent," Dr. Lawrence Parks, Executive Director of the FAME Foundation said:
Before I introduce Dr. Vieira, I want to spend less than two minutes positioning his topic. Our monetary system is an abomination. It violates almost all of the principles that civilized people hold dear:
From the Biblical point of view, our monetary system violates the admonitions in Deuteronomy not to tamper with weights and measures, and, as clergymen pointed out after the Civil War, it violates the Eighth Commandment not to steal.
- Under Jewish Law, it violates the gnivas das commandment not to misrepresent.
From a moral point of view, mindful that our money is legal tender, Salmon Chase, when he was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1869, wrote that the legal tender quality of money is only needed for the purposes of dishonesty.
Economically, fiat monetary systems such as ours have been collapsing for nearly 1,200 years wiping out savings and promises of future payments, such as pensions and annuities. There have been no successes.
From a scientific viewpoint, Isaac Newton put the kabaach on fiat money at the end of the 17th century when he declared that such money would have no defined unit of measure. That is, our money has nothing to tie it to reality. It is part of the spiritual world. Today, economists describe money as an "illusion."
In terms of personal relationships, our monetary system violates the sanctity of contracts, because one does not know what will be the value of future payments. That is, it violates the notion of keeping promises, which is the glue that holds civilization together.
Now comes Dr. Edwin Vieira who teaches that our monetary system violates the Rule of Law, something that we all hold dear and that our politicians give lip service to. Particularly, he teaches that it violates the supreme law of our land: the Constitution.
There is no one better qualified to talk to us about this issue than Ed Vieira. A Harvard trained attorney with a doctorate in chemistry, (also from Harvard), Ed is the world's foremost authority about the role of our Constitution as it relates to money.
He is also one of our country's most eminent constitutional attorneys, having brought four cases that were accepted by the Supreme Court and having won three of them. . . Full story: Fame.org
Hamas' History tied to Israel
June 18, 2002 — Israel and Hamas may currently be locked in deadly combat, but, according to several current and former US intelligence officials, beginning in the late 1970s, Tel Aviv gave direct and indirect financial aid to Hamas over a period of years.
Israel "aided Hamas directly—the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance to the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization)," said Tony Cordesman, Middle East analyst for the Center for Strategic Studies.
Israel's support for Hamas "was a direct attempt to divide and dilute support for a strong, secular PLO by using a competing religious alternative," said a former senior CIA official . . .
According to US administration officials, funds for the movement came from the oil-producing states and directly and indirectly from Israel. . . some in Israel saw some benefits to be had in trying to continue giving Hamas support: "The thinking on the part of some of the right-wing Israeli establishment was that Hamas and the others, if they gained control, would refuse to have any part of the peace process and would torpedo any agreements put in place," said a US government official who asked not to be named. "Israel would still be the only democracy in the region for the United States to deal with," . . .
According to former State Department counter-terrorism official Larry Johnson, "the Israelis are their own worst enemies when it comes to fighting terrorism . . . They do more to incite and sustain terrorism than curb it," he said.
. . . Brig. Gen. Yithaq Segev, the military governor of Gaza, had told US officials he had helped fund "Islamic movements as a counterweight . . ."
Defining Hamas: Roots in Charity and Branches of Violence:
June 16, 2003 — ". . . The roots of Hamas begin in the person of Sheik Ahmed Yassin, who was active in Muslim Brotherhood politics in Gaza and established a social welfare group. In 1987, when Palestinians rose up against the Israeli military occupation, he founded Hamas. The group's popularity stemmed in part from the absence of the P.L.O., whose leaders were exiled in 1982.
Some experts contend that Israel encouraged the development of Hamas indirectly as a way to weaken Mr. Arafat's Fatah party. "The intention at the time was to try to stop the increasing power of Fatah," said Yohanan Tzoref of the International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism in Israel . . ."
Comment: Protocol No.12 says: "I beg you to note that among those making attack upon us, will also be organs established by us, but they will attack exclusively those points which we have predetermined to alter. Not one single pronouncement will reach the public without our control." Full story: upi.com nytimes.com
The Lies of our Leaders
By John Kaminski
Americans believe it's no longer important to tell the truth. President Bush and virtually the entire American power structure lied to the whole world when they said Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction that were an imminent threat to the safety of the so-called free world.
Beyond any doubt, these assertions have since been exposed as falsehoods. Still, few Americans really give a damn and business goes on as usual in the foreshadow of a massive worldwide economic collapse.
President Bush and virtually the entire American power structure lied when they said we needed to invade Afghanistan to bring to justice the alleged perpetrators of the 9/11 horror. Shortly after the invasion began, Gen. Tommy Franks announced it wasn't important to capture the so-called ringleader, Osama bin Laden, even as the Afghanis' Taliban government offered to furnish him for trial in a neutral country. The real objective, Franks said during the attack, was to subdue the whole country.
With the fictional al-Qaeda network still being used as a pretext for permanent war against the entire world by the United States and bin Laden still uncaptured, it has become obvious to everyone that the reason for obliterating Afghanistan with nuclear weapons and murdering tens of thousands of innocent people was something other than capturing a suspected terrorist, although none of us are quite sure what that reason was. Talk of Enron, oil pipelines and geopolitical strategies are generally censored from the television news.
The situation is identical is Iraq. What was the purpose of blasting several thousand innocents into heaven when the situation it produced is actually more of a threat to our security than was the continued dictatorship of Saddam Hussein? None of us are quite sure what that reason was, although we all have our favorite suspicions: oil, Israel, expenditure of military stockpiles and creation of lucrative contracts for corporate supporters of the war machine to revive a disintegrating American economy.
Those two lies "justifying depraved mass murder in two defenseless countries" now stand as the ranking horrors in American history. In the 227 years of our history, from the smallpox blankets of Colonial days to Waco, America has done nothing worse (although many military adventures, notably the Philippines in 1899 and Vietnam in the 1960s, were almost as bad and unjustifiable).
But the real question as America sinks into the suffocating hell of a totalitarian dictatorship is this:
If our leaders have been proved to be liars about the sick and sinful destruction of humanity in Afghanistan and Iraq, why do a majority of Americans still accept what these same lying leaders said about the 9/11 atrocity, that it was the work of foreign terrorists who envied our freedom! As Gerard Holmgren once so aptly said, this is the most ridiculous of all conspiracy theories to believe.
To a special few, responsibility for the 9/11 butchery has always been obvious. Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote about the need for it in a book (The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Geostrategic Objectives), and the Republican-dominated Project for a New American Century recommended it as a desirable event for achieving its goals. But most simpleton Americans are afraid to even contemplate such a frightening possibility. They would prefer to believe the lie, without really realizing what will happen to them if they do.
In the history of the world, there has never been a bigger lie than 9/11, yet most Americans still cling in closed-minded terror to the official story, swallow their pride at airports as minimum-wage fascists probe their private parts, stick flag decals on their cars in hopes they won't be pulled over and jailed for something they don't expect by Ashcroft's new stormtroopers, and watch in numbed banality as the official government investigation begins by saying they already know who did it, so there's no sense investigating that.
Americans have swallowed the lie whole-hog that we need to beef up security because there are terrorists in our midst, when the obvious fact is that the terrorists reside in Washington, and are terrorizing the whole world, with the eager help of your neighbors, the corrupt local police and corrupt local judges, who accept what their superiors order them to do. . . . American cops are now . . . participating in the elimination of all those who won't participate in the American master plan of enslaving the world . . .
How can this possibly be happening? How can Americans have gone brain-dead all at once? It didn't happen overnight, I can tell you. From the Kennedy assassination onward, Americans have been conditioned to accept phony excuses for political crimes as protests and questions are all blunted in a mind-numbing miasma of bureaucratic mazes. So everyone gave up trying to ask questions, and rationalized their indifference as not critical to my survival. Time to guess again.
Even more disturbing than the murderous plans of Bush and his petronazi gang of Zionist manipulators is the silent acquiescence of the so-called opposition. These "liberal" Democrats CREATED the Patriot Act, which castrates our Constitution. These gutless bureaucrats, ever mindful of the need to attract corporate campaign contributions, went along with Bush's invasions for fear of losing the votes of mindless, flag-waving fascist Americans.
Consider the Democratic opposition for a moment: Hillary Clinton, Kerry, Lieberman, Gephardt, Edwards, Dean, Mosely-Braun, Sharpton all but one of the Democratic candidates BACKED the military moves of Bush. And all of them - no exceptions—endorse the lies we have been told about 9/11, as well as the fiction that Israel is a benevolent democracy.
I get a big laugh out of all these calls for petitions on various issues. Ha. And the same goes double for all this talk about the next election. Ha ha. The elections of 2000 proved Americans no longer have elections. It doesn't matter who you vote for. Who they want to win will win, and they have both the technological expertise and the cash on hand to make it happen. Just ask any Supreme Court justice.
Take your presidential candidate and stuff him. The American system of democracy is dead. The presidential campaign is a sideshow to delude the American populace into thinking they still have choice about what happens. Bulletin: they don't.
No one in Congress is telling the truth (OK, you might find one or two who are telling the truth about SOME things, one less without Paul Wellstone, who was clearly murdered).
No candidate for any office anywhere in the United States is saying that 9/11 was a hoax, a cynical gambit to scare the American people into accepting police state measures. That's why no candidate now running for any office is telling the truth.
No one who thinks of running public office can seriously entertain the notion they can fix anything. Because to fix anything, you have to dig into the big problems that keep the war machine afloat, principally the pervasive influence of Judaism and Zionism, which have fatally infected most of the societies in the world with their manipulative brand of behavioral bulldust, and undermined morality everywhere. When morality is relative, evil prevails, because temptation and corruption are the human conditions.
No one running for public office will begin to address the obvious issue that 9/11 was aimed at defaming Muslims, thereby legitimizing two horrible American crimes: the Israeli genocide of the Palestinians and the conquest of all the oil resources in the world.
And when the religions themselves have grown corrupt by their own power over people, there is no hope, anarchy follows and chaos triumphs. There is no hope. That is the situation we now face.
Eventually, after thousands of photos of bloodied bodies, after all the uteruses of our soldiers' wives are bleeding from the effects of radioactive ammunition, after you realize that one day you are out of money and there's nowhere to get more because the fat cats have stolen it all and surrounded themselves with Wackenhut wackos, you'll come to the realization about blame.
There's no real sense blaming Jews or Catholics, or oil executives or money launderers. We've done all this to ourselves, simply by not paying attention to what's actually happening.
It isn't Bush or Daschle who are the real scumbags, the real killers of innocent people in the pursuit of profit. It's nobody but us, we the intelligent citizens of the world who failed to pay attention, or took a bribe, or looked the other way when we saw somebody doing something wrong because it was easier that way.
It is we who kept our mouths shut during all those scams, Vietnam, the savings and loan robbery, Waco, 9/11. We were too afraid to ask real questions, and thought we could get by waving our flags and going along with the crowd. But each new government atrocity got worse, right up through 9/11.
And, sadly, the worst has yet to come.
It's too late now. Nothing can be done. They can't be stopped. We waited too long. We waited until they had amassed their armies, their biological identification devices, their roadblocks, their internment camps for protesters, the death penalty in Oregon for protesting, their genetically modified food supply (guaranteeing billions of needless deaths), their aluminumization of our atmosphere, their privatization of our water, their shaping of our very brains through Zionist educational philosophies and Zionist entertainment programming until our minds were so zapped out on misleading trivialities that we couldn't even ask the most basic question of all anymore. Which is this?
Why couldn't we see this would happen? It was because we didn't pay attention to all those other horrors?
Why didn't we know you can't turn your back on the world, and expect the world to still be there when you turn back around?
There is no forgiveness, and no way to put things right without a massive bloodbath now. Which is just what they wanted, just what they practice. They've won. And we've lost.
But don't blame it on the lies of our leaders. Blame it on the lies we told—and are still telling—ourselves.
(John Kaminski talks on a webcast at lewisnews.com most Friday nights. You may write to him at [email protected]). nl278.htm
Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.
Bible Believers' Church
Gunnedah NSW
Australia 2380e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers' Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe to Newsletter Unsubscribe from Newsletter
