Bible Believers' Newsletter 487

"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; we are pleased you could join us for another fellowship in cyberspace and thank you for your kind letters of encouragement.

Our friend Sister Joan Veon is this week's guest contributor. A Christian businesswoman and international reporter, she has covered 75 globalist meetings in different countries around the world, publishes a WTO Report, and may be contacted via The Women's International Media Group website.

Reinventing Government shows one need no longer fear ridicule as a student of the Conspiracy, and disarmed by their own ignorance, those without oil in their lamps are beginning to realize the terrors soon to overtake the world as the pieces of globalism's jigsaw puzzle comes together in plain view. The hard work of Amschel Mayer Rothschild, his co-conspirators and their fellow travelers, "those very naughty figs, which could not be eaten, they were so bad," are about to accomplish vicariously the objective Lucifer failed to negotiate personally, and bear his rotten fruit (Matthew 4:8-9; Luke 13:6-9).

Hasten slowly. Carefully read every link: your life and eternal Life may depend on your familiarity with these matters.

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ,
Anthony Grigor-Scott

Next elected Dictator of USA, Hillary Clinton? WWIII with Russia & China?

In his March 1933 vision William Brennan, [sic] then a Baptist minister during the great depression, and afterwards a pioneering healing Pentecost evangelist in the 40s, 50s and 60s, while preparing for his Sunday morning sermon, received a vision from the Lord in which was shown to him seven events that will occur before the end.

He was shown that Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who had just been inaugurated (in that time Presidents were inaugurated in March not in January), will be elected four times, a thing unheard of before, that this president would lead a country in another World War (WWII started in 1941), he was told that the man ruling Italy will die in a shameful way (Mussolini was killed by Italian partisans and hanged upside-down to be spat upon by his fellow citizens), that Adolph Hitler would become a tyrant who would lead the world into great bloodshed, the Lord showed him the immorality that would come upon America (he was shown the clothing of women that they will almost be naked), and the last thing he saw were people riding in egg-shaped cars and that the passengers in them would be amused by games while they were driving.

The next thing he saw was that an evil, wicked woman was running the USA. She become a dictator. And the next scene he saw was the smoking ruins of America. He saw that after this women take control of the nation, the nation will be destroyed. If this was talking about Hillary Clinton, we are really close. . . Full story:

Comment: As we meditate on the "mellowing" of Communism (except in China, of course), we would do well to remember Dimitri Manuilski's words: "The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. . . The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to join in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our clenched fist."

It should be obvious by now why "the death of Communism" had to be staged. How else could Michael Gorbachev, chief Marxist-Leninist, and agent for Pharisees of the City of London, be able to base his operations in the world's chief anti-Communist country? How else would Western leaders consult without alarming their own citizens? How else would the masses be prevented from realizing that the purpose of such consultation is to work out the final details of a Communist world government?

Mikhail Gorbachev (whose Jewish surname is Kahn) declared in a speech at the seventieth anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution: ". . . In October 1917, we parted with the old world, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world, a world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road."

Speaking to the Soviet Politburo on November 1987, he stated: "Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about Glasnost and Perestroika and democracy in the coming years. They are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal changes in the Soviet Union other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep. We want to accomplish three things:

These visions of the destruction of the USA by missiles launched from Soviet submarines confirm information Peter Beter gave the USDOD in the 1970's, as reported in Bible Believers' Newsletters in 2006.

Ex-CIA Officer slams US Allegations against Iran as Sham

July 28, 2007 – In an alarming exposure of the acceleration and urgency of the American war party's push towards catastrophic war with Iran, Philip Giraldi, former CIA counter terrorism officer, in an interview on 24th July with Anti War Radio debunked the NeoCons' repeated myth of Iran's support for al Qaeda as a pretext for war. Whilst acknowledging Iran's helpfulness in trying to establish security in both Afghanistan and Iraq, Giraldi spoke of the United States' hypocritical and illegal support for terrorist separatists groups inside Iran, and various plans and scenarios which have been drawn up to destroy Iran's military and economic infrastructure by massive bombardment, with the use of nuclear bombs a real and stated possibility. . . Full story:

US Government fails to explain "Chemtrails Hoax"

Its official: US Department of Air Force and US Federal Aviation Administration confirm Chemtrails are a product of chronic imaginitis. Full story:

US set to offer Huge Arms Deal to Saudi Arabia

Washington, July 27 – The Bush administration is preparing to ask Congress to approve an arms sale package for Saudi Arabia and its neighbors that is expected to eventually total $20 billion at a time when some United States officials contend that the Saudis are playing a counterproductive role in Iraq.

The proposed package of advanced weaponry for Saudi Arabia, which includes advanced satellite-guided bombs, upgrades to its fighters and new naval vessels, has made Israel and some of its supporters in Congress nervous. Senior officials who described the package on Friday said they believed that the administration had resolved those concerns, in part by promising Israel $30.4 billion in military aid over the next decade, a significant increase over what Israel has received in the past 10 years. . . Full story:

Comment: The chairman of the German parliament's foreign affairs committee, Ruprecht Polenz, told the daily Frankfurter Rundschau that the Middle East was already a "powder keg" and that an influx of weapons could set it off. "If you add more explosives to a powder keg, you increase the risk and do not make the region more secure".

Considering CIA operative, the late Osama bin Laden was born of a Jewish mother and the Jewish origins of the House of Saud and the Wahabi sect of Islam could this be the objective. This WWIII is taking too long to reach the "hot" stage. "As the Washington Post's Walter Pincus reported last year, more than 70 percent of the staff of the Pentagon's newest intelligence unit, CIFA (Counterintelligence Field Activity), is made up of corporate contractors.

Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) lawyers revealed at a conference in May that contractors make up 51 percent of the staff in DIA offices. At the CIA, the situation is similar. Between 50 and 60 percent of the workforce of the CIA's most important directorate, the National Clandestine Service (NCS), responsible for the gathering of human intelligence, is composed of employees of for-profit corporations. . . Sources like "Curveball," the Iraqi informant who wrongly asserted the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and upon whom the CIA relied, are no longer needed. This is particularly frightening when one considers that the "war on terror" is fought by a $100 billion-plus industry that has a vested interest in its continuation". Full story:

Brother Branham said, "Let's prove what's God. If education is the way out to freedom, why don't it act? If social standings and so forth is the way out, why don't it act? If paying other nations to be our buddies, and we find out they've turned heels against us just as soon they can. . . And you can't buy friendship with money. Friendship is a gift of God" (What Does Thou Here, p. 6:40).

National Security Agency-Vatican Logo

NSA logoVatican logo

A curiosity among an unusual series of images associated with the ubiquitous Roman Catholic church is the logo of the US National Security Agency in which the American Eagle (or Talmudic Phoenix of the Illuminati) clutches what may be one of the Keys of St. Peter (so-called), or perhaps the key to Uncle Sam's back door, or all of your personal information.

Reinventing Government

By Joan Veon 2007 – All Rights Reserved

Sister Joan Veon

The Seventh Global Forum on Reinventing Government recently concluded in Vienna. For the first time since this type of meeting was organized in 1999, the United Nations hosted a conference on changing the structure of government worldwide to be more democratic. What does it mean to have the United Nations in charge of changing the structure of national government worldwide? We must primarily consider the actions of President Clinton who began the reinventing government process in the United States.

In 1989 Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton became chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC). The DLC is also affiliated with the Progressive Policy Institute and the Smith Institute of London and was created to develop the "third way" philosophy and governing agenda. When he ran for the presidency, Clinton promised change and was the first to campaign on the concept of reinventing government.

On March 3, 1994, he announced, "We intend to redesign, to reinvent, to reinvigorate the entire national government"  (Washington Times, March 4, 1994). In his January, 1995 State of the Union address, Clinton announced a "New Covenant" which he said was:

The president kept his word and created the National Performance Review. They reported that over a five year period of time, the US Government eliminated 250 outdated government programs, slashed more than 160,000 pages of regulations, cut more than 640,000 pages of internal rules, helped balance the federal budget for the first time in 30 years and cut more than 351,000 employees. However, reinventing government is more than just making government more efficient.

In 1999 when Vice President Al Gore hosted the first annual meeting on "Reinventing Government" at the State Department, he said overly centralized government is an impediment in the 21st century high-speed, high-tech economy. He explained, "To promote prosperity in the new economy, nations will have to reinvent their economic and regulatory institutions to respond to citizens and markets in a more flexible and efficient manner." Various countries testified as to what they were doing to reinvent government in their country.

Various books and reports started to pop up. Some of them included: Our Common Future by the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987, Creating a New Civilization—The Politics of the Third Wave in 1994 by Alvin and Heidi Toffler, An Agenda for Peace by Boutros Boutros-Ghali in 1995, and Our Global Neighborhood by The Commission on Global Governance in 1995. For our purposes we will address the Toffler's book and the report, Our Global Neighborhood.

In Toffler's book, Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich wrote a very glowing forward in which he explained that he began working with the Toffler's in the early 1970s on a concept called "anticipatory democracy" when he was an assistant professor at West Georgia State College. Gingrich wrote that he has worked with them to develop a "future-conscious politics and popular understanding that would make it easier for America to make the transition from the Second Wave (industrial revolution) civilization—which is clearly dying—to the emerging, but in many ways undefined and not fully understood Third Wave civilization." The Toffler's state that a centralized form of bureaucratic government is outdated in the new Third Wave and that "more appropriate political structures" are needed because "In all likelihood it will require a protracted battle to radically overhaul the United States Congress, the House of Commons and the House of Lords, the French Chamber of Deputies, the Bundestag, the Diet, the giant ministries and entrenched civil services of many nations, their constitutions and court systems—in short, much of the unwieldy and increasingly unworkable apparatus of existing representative governments. Nor will this wave of political struggle stop at the national level. Over the months and decades ahead, the entire 'global law machine'—from the United Nations at one end to the local city or town council at the other—will eventually face a mounting, ultimately irresistible demand for restructuring." The Toffler's say that the Third Wave society of the Internet age must depend on "the principle of 'semi-direct democracy'—a shift from depending on representatives to representing ourselves."

Toffler's book was followed by the release of Our Global Neighborhood which provided an independent report, we are told, in which the Commission wrote, "[B]ecause of the changes of recent years, we are at a new time, that we need a new order in world affairs, a new style of managing our relations on this planet and a new way of relating to the planet." The Commission provided a definition of "governance" which is "[T]he sum of the many ways individuals and institutions, public and private, manage their common affairs." They explain that "when the United Nations was created, nation-states, some of them [with] imperial powers were dominant." They expanded the definition of governance to "global governance" which is "the governance of diversity, not uniformity; it is governance through democracy, not through dominion; it is governance that is multi-layered, not from the mountain-top. It is necessarily governance as an un-centralized system." In short, their definition of global governance is exactly what those who want to reinvent government are talking about! It builds on the Toffler theory of "more inclusive and participatory democracy." All of this is in the making—there is no pattern in all of history for what they are proposing! In short, the Commission writes, "The creation of adequate governance mechanisms will be complicated. There must be an agreed global framework for actions and policies to be carried out at appropriate levels."

At the first meeting on reinventing government, then Secretary of State Madeline Albright testified that the State Department had been reinventing itself and World Bank President Jim Wolfenson described how the World Bank was reinventing itself to help countries with their public sectors. In the UK, the Blair government was also reinventing itself and that was the vision of the Blair government. Their program, "Modernizing Government," according to Minister for the Cabinet Office Jack Cunningham, was dividing the work of government so that tasks "were more clearly defined. Some tasks were privatized, others were contracted out, or devolved to new, clearly focused agencies, and performance-related pay was introduced." Furthermore, the barriers between the different organizations of government were removed so they could work together. They created a new performance and innovation unit to determine how to better deliver government's objectives at the local level. Britain put in place family leave and launched new partnerships across government to deliver their policy pledges. They also set a target that by 2002, at least 25% of all government services should be capable of being delivered by electronic means: banking, the Internet, digital TV and telephone. The UK passed their own Freedom of Information Act and a people's panel of 5,000 to nationally represent their citizens to tell them what they think of government and their services.

Other countries testified of decentralizing government with the prime minister having the greatest power to coordinate the ministers of government and to rule them. Many former Comecon countries were adopting market-based democracy rules, privatizing government services by changing the constitution to end state monopolies. Canada testified that they have been "downsizing, privatizing, deregulating, and so on." Jocelyne Bourgon, Canada's Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet testified on reinventing government, "It means re-modernizing the role of government. What are the new roles that government will be called upon to play to adapt to a global economy, knowledge-based society, information age, digital age and so on? New roles that did not exist before. Like all of you, we've been experimenting with partnerships, strategic alliances with the private sector, academy, community, NGO, single society."

Common elements of reinventing government included public-private partnerships, de-regulating, privatizing and moving to electronic government. In an interview I did in Vienna with an official of Microsoft, he told me that at some point, there would be no need for a physical Congress for it would all be done electronically—within a country and between countries!

But let us consider globalization. Globalization is the process of tearing down barriers between the nation-states. When we consider that with the establishment of every international institution since 1944, the economic, political, trade, and legal barriers are gone. While I understood that Y2K wired the world, I did not carry it as far as electronic government! Furthermore, 9/11 tore down the most sensitive barriers: the military and intelligence. Basically the barriers between countries, for the most part, are gone.

Therefore what is left? To harmonize, integrate and reinvent government! Back in 1989, reinventing government became the mantra of the Democratic Leadership Council and the Smith Institute of the U.K. Eighteen years later it has been shifted to the United Nations. The First Global Forum on Reinventing Government was sponsored by the World Bank, the Ford Foundation, the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the Brookings Institute, all bastions of a progressive and democratic form of government, and not a republican form of government!

I find it fascinating that it was Margaret Thatcher who decided to adopt the economics of Frederic von Hayek who advocated smaller government through privatization of state assets. President Reagan agreed and during his term in office he adopted smaller government when he declared, "Get government off our backs." Little did the American people know that he was putting the foundation in place for big business to come in and buy up government through privatization and public private partnership. Now we see that the next level in destroying the nation-state as we know it was for Bill Clinton and Tony Blair to make reinventing government the centerpiece of their government. Today, based on the joint legacy of Thatcher/Reagan and Clinton/Blair, we have the infrastructure assets of government being sold: roads, bridges, water, electricity, sewer systems, airports, etc. As these assets are sold off, the citizens are being robbed of investments in government made with their tax dollars.

So just what are we witnessing in the 21st Century? Bottom line is that with the barriers between the nation-states gone and with the shift from the congresses and parliaments of the world to the local level along with the implementation of public-private partnerships which is the buy-out of government by business, the form that is really being put in place is global corporate fascism. With every new public-private partnership, representative government diminishes. While we are told civil society will have a voice, that voice is only limited to its financial power. Who has the power when the representatives of public-private partnership are sitting around the corporate table? Is it the bankrupt governments? Is it civil society? Or is it big business?

Furthermore, in a world without barriers and borders, we have the end of the nation-state as we have known it. As the world moves toward a global currency and a global tax, America will move away from the Constitution and Bill of Rights. As the Toffler's wrote, "Over the months and decades ahead, the entire 'global law machine'—from the United Nations at one end to the local city or town council at the other—will eventually face a mounting, ultimately irresistible demand for restructuring." But no one can tell us what it really means; when governments are stripped of assets, citizens become customers, and national government is no longer.

Bill Clinton is no George Washington and Hillary is no Betsy Ross. Unfortunately those who want a world governmental system or the reinventing of government are those who really want the world put back under British rule: the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and others. The world which is being reinvented is not being reinvented for you and me. As one man stated at the World Economic Forum several years ago, "The world depends on the US to get it right and when the US does not have it right, the world does not have it right." Where are the midnight riders who cried "The British are coming!" when danger was mounting during our fight for freedom? Freedom, when lost, is lost forever. We are no longer fighting the British, we have joined them!

For further information, see The United Nations' Global Straitjacket in which Joan Veon devotes a chapter to "reinventing government," and view her new DVD, Public Private Partnerships.

Comment: Benjamin Franklin cautioned, "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." Do you see how the International Banksters and their cronies are asset-stripping nations, stealing public resources, disempowering citizens and returning the world to serfdom? Privatization and public-private partnerships shift authority from government and citizens to corporate investors, for he who has the gold rules. The costs have been socialised by past taxpayer dollars; now the profits are being privatized, and worse: the assets having been transferred, the nations stripped of national wealth will accumulate debt, enslaving their citizens to the usurers and tax-farmers. This research explains how it is done and who is doing the doing We outlined the procedure in a six-part series, World Depopulation and Slavery.

The 'hidden hand' has transformed America from a republic to a democracy, which Franklin described as "two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." The well-armed lamb is clad in the full armour of God "taking the shield of faith, wherewith he will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked, wearing the helmet of salvation and with the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God, praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints".

Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty. Where liberty dwells, there is my country." Beullah Land, here we come.

What Sister Veon refers to as "the British" is actually the City of London, a one mile square alien sovereign state belonging to the successors of those who conquered England in 1649. The new form of government called 'reinvented government,' is based on Communitarianism or the 'Third Way' which is a merger between capitalism and communism in the same way that sustainable development and globalism are mergers between capitalism and communism."

Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, confided personally to Norman Dodd, Director of Research for the Reece Committee of the US Senate in 1953, "Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making level of the foundation have at one time or another served in the 0SS (the Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA) or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from the White House. We operate under those same directives. . . The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."

Stunned, Dodd finally replied, "Why don't you tell the American people what you just told me and you could save the taxpayers thousands of dollars set aside for this investigation?" Gaither responded, "Mr. Dodd, we wouldn't think of doing that." So you see, the United States is still a British Colony, and it is the image of the beast in the natural as the (once) Protestant churches are in the Spiritual.

Brother Branham said, "God's church is united under God. Man has nothing to do with it. It's united under God. . . But the manmade religions will all come into this antichrist religion. There'll be two forms of them. One form will come from Rome, which will be the beast, and there is an image unto the beast, which will be the ecclesiastical head of the Protestant church heap up as a image unto the beast under the denominational world. And it'll all come under one great dominion . . . the devil uniting people under one head, one ecclesiastical head, a man on earth. The Bible said he would set in the temple of God, showing that he is God. And how he would wear a triple crown . . . the vicar of heaven, earth, and purgatory. And under this would be an image to him, where all the rest of them would unite together. But the church of the living God will be united under the power of God and the supervision of the Holy Spirit."

"The devil that's controlling Russia is trying to unite all the world under Communism. They'll never be able to do it. And then the UN, United Nations, is trying to unite them under a union police force, another manmade system. It never will work; it can't. But they're all trying to" (The Oneness of Unity, p. 4:24-33).

Rome will rule the world until she breaks her agreement with the International Jewish Banksters. They will openly change their alliance to Judaeo-Communist Russia, which is their creation God allowed them to raise up in order to destroy the false church. Russia will destroy both Vatican City State and the United States. Then Armageddon will set in, destroying all life on earth. nl487.htm

Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

Bible Believers' Church
Currabubula NSW
Australia 2342
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers' Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe to Newsletter Unsubscribe from Newsletter