Bible Believers' Newsletter 497

"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, it is good to see you, and especially our new subscribers.

One Nisan 14, when the last of the wise virgin recognizes her day and its Message, grace will end and Los Angeles will sink, taking Hollywood to the bottom of the ocean (Revelation 18:21-24). God is waiting for that last predestinated soul. Thousands around the world possess the "letter" of the Spoken Word in books, on CD, DVD or MP3 in their own language; I fear very few possess the revelation in their heart. Many, in particularly pastors, are traveling as if they were evangelists, teachers or apostles, and increasing worldly knowledge as Daniel foretold. Are these men and their forsaken congregations in the faith of Jesus Christ, or have their lamps gone out through lack of oil?

Jesus said "His wife has made herself ready, dressed in the righteousness of His revealed Word." The resources of time and money spend impersonating Wesley's pollinating age should be directed to call a Bride out from the denominations into the unity of the faith for the manifestation of the Sons of God and the translation. This is lamp-trimming time, and there are not many Brethren or even ministers in the circle of this Message with oil in their lamps, so redeem the time.

Please welcome our guest contributor, Brother Louis F. DeBoer who edits websites for the American Presbyterian Press and the American Presbyterian Church. The Adversary has smitten Brother DeBoer with cancer, and he would appreciate your effectual, fervent prayer that when the Lord's good and holy purposes in sending this trial have been accomplished He may be gracious and restore him to health that he might continue to labor in His vineyard if it be His holy will.

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ,
Anthony Grigor-Scott

Anglican Church approves Women Bishops

September 28, 2007 – The Anglican church's highest legal authority has cleared the way for women to be ordained as bishops. The Australian church's highest court, the Appellate Tribunal, ruled there was no constitutional bar to them assuming the most senior leadership role in the church. . . Full story:

Comment: Archbishops Phillip Aspinall and Roger Herft, Bishop Peter Brain, Justices Keith Mason and Peter Young of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Justice David Bleby of the Supreme Court of South Australia, and Chancellor of the Diocese of the Northern Territory, Mr. Max Horton sat on this Tribunal, creating "case law" that overrides God's unchanging Word. They have not "shown themselves approved of God by rightly divided the Word of Truth." Your Church has been defending herself against vexatious and frivolous litigation for four years because Federal Court judges who know not God created "case law" that overrides statute law and contradicts every Bible, 2,500 years of history, every encyclopaedia and dictionary, and is based upon similarly contrived "case law" of the British Assessment Registry (BAR) of Rothschild's London Lawyers' Guild.

God will never ordain a woman to the five-fold ministry or sanction her in the office of bishop. A bishop is a lay-MAN with an ability to teach doctrine his pastor has already taught whereas woman is forbidden to teach or usurp authority over a man. She is not original creation but is made so she can deceive and be deceived; she is to be subject to the authority of men and under submission to her own husband. A bishop must be the husband of one wife, not the wife of one husband, and his authority does not extend beyond his local assembly (Matthew 24:35; Hebrews 13:8; Revelation 3:17).

The Anglicans are impersonating the Sardis Church Age (1520-1750), not knowing the apostolic faith has been restored, and the mystery of God is finished (Malachi 4:5-6; Matthew 17:11; I Thessalonians 4:5-6; Revelation 10:1-7). We are now in the holy convocation of the fiftieth day of the antitype of Israel's feast of Pentecost. The delay whilst Christ intercedes for the PART-Word saints ended, and the threefold PROCESS called the 'rapture' commenced in 1963.

Two Hotels take Bibles from Rooms

May 29, 2001 – "Bibles have been removed from guests' rooms at two major Adelaide hotels, ending a long-standing tradition. Management of the Singaporean-owned Stamford Plaza, opposite Parliament House, and Stamford Grand at Glenelg say Australia is a multifaith society and hotel guests cannot be assumed to be Christian. The Gideon's Bibles at the Stamford Plaza were taken from the rooms on the instruction of general manager Graeme Goldberg, who is Jewish" (The Adelaide Advertiser).

Comment: "Jews are human beings; the other peoples of the world are but beasts" (Baba Mezia 114b). This deranged Judaic vision of world conquest is symbolized in the esoteric Hebrew mysticism of Kabala, and the Talmudic allegory of the World Serpent, girdling the globe with the head and the tail meeting in Jerusalem.

In 1492, Chemor, Chief Rabbi of Spain received this advice from the Grand Sanhedrin (Elders of Zion) on how to deal with their threatened expulsion. The same ancient agenda is set forth in the Protocols and is followed today:

'Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great a pain to hear it as yourselves.

The advice of the Grand Satraps and the Rabbis is the following:

As for what you say that the king of Spain obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.

As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.

As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christian's lives.

As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches. As for the other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.

Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.

(Signed) Prince of the Jews of Constantinople' (Julio-Inigrez de Medrano – 'La Silva Curiosa' 1608).

As England's first Jewish Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli wrote, "the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." Thus, "the things that the preacher is liable to teach yer, ain't necessarily so".

"Ringing Like Crazy": Were U.S. Military Phones 'War-Dialed' on 9/11?

October 3, 2007 – Is this how NORAD was duped? Keep these facts in mind as you read the linked article:

Now ask yourself: Who benefited most from the attacks of 9/11?

Let's let former Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu take a stab at the answer. His response when asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations: "It's very good".

"We control the United States. And the Americans know it." Former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

"On the morning of 9/11, every NORAD phone had been ringing off the hook . . . that would be quite a hindrance when you are trying to respond to an unprecedented emergency. And if telephones ‘ringing like crazy' were really such a harmless occurrence, the US military would have had no need to practice dealing with it during the training exercises that were underway that morning. Might a Computer Network Attack (CNA) have provided a smokescreen for sabotaging the phone system, at a time when the US military needed to communicate most effectively so as to respond to the real world attacks? If so, who was behind this act of treason?" . . . Full story:

The Alarming Parallels between 1929 and 2007

October 2, 2007 – My name is Robert Kuttner. I am an economics and financial journalist, author of several books about the economy, co-editor of The American Prospect, and former investigator for the Senate Banking Committee. I have a book appearing in a few weeks that addresses the systemic risks of financial innovation coupled with deregulation and the moral hazard of periodic bailouts.

In researching the book, I devoted a lot of effort to reviewing the abuses of the 1920s, the effort in the 1930s to create a financial system that would prevent repetition of those abuses, and the steady dismantling of the safeguards over the last three decades in the name of free markets and financial innovation. Your predecessors on the Senate Banking Committee, in the celebrated Pecora Hearings of 1933 and 1934, laid the groundwork for the modern edifice of financial regulation. I suspect that they would be appalled at the parallels between the systemic risks of the 1920s and many of the modern practices that have been permitted to seep back in to our financial markets.

Although the particulars are different, my reading of financial history suggests that the abuses and risks are all too similar and enduring. When you strip them down to their essence, they are variations on a few hardy perennials—excessive leveraging, misrepresentation, insider conflicts of interest, non-transparency, and the triumph of engineered euphoria over evidence.

The most basic and alarming parallel is the creation of asset bubbles, in which the purveyors of securities use very high leverage; the securities are sold to the public or to specialized funds with underlying collateral of uncertain value; and financial middlemen extract exorbitant returns at the expense of the real economy. This was the essence of the abuse of public utilities stock pyramids in the 1920s, where multi-layered holding companies allowed securities to be watered down, to the point where the real collateral was worth just a few cents on the dollar, and returns were diverted from operating companies and ratepayers. This only became exposed when the bubble burst. . .

The fact is that the economic fundamentals are sound—if you look at the real economy of factories and farms, and internet entrepreneurs, and retailing innovation and scientific research laboratories. It is the financial economy that is dangerously unsound. . . Congress has a window in which restore prudential regulation, and we should use that window before the next crisis turns out to be a mortal one. Full story:

Comment: "You watch for a depression, brother. You think you've seen something; you just wait after while. You haven't seen nothing" (William Branham, Jezebel Religion, p. 22:100).

Dollar's Double Blow from Vietnam and Qatar

October 4, 2007 – The Saigon Times said this morning that the State Bank of Vietnam was abandoning the attempt to hold down the Vietnamese currency through heavy purchases of dollars. The policy is causing the economy to overheat, driving up inflation to 8.8pc. Vietnam, which has mid-sized reserves of $40bn, is seen as weather vane for the bigger Asian powers. Together they hold $3,575bn of foreign reserves, over 65pc of the world's total. China leads with $1,340bn, but South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and even Thailand all built up massive holdings. The concern is that once one or two members of the region jump ship, it could set off a broader scramble. None of them want to be the last one left holding a devalued asset. . .

Separately, the gas-rich Gulf state of Qatar announced that it had cut the dollar holdings of its $50bn sovereign wealth fund from 99pc to 40pc, switching into investments in China, Japan, and emerging Asia. The move . . . can easily be seen as a vote of no confidence in US economic management. The drastic shift by the Qatar Investment Authority is a warning that petro-dollar powers with some $3,500bn under management may pull the plug on the heavily indebted US economy—which needs to suck in the majority of the world's savings just to stay afloat . . . Full story:

Russia warns of Arms War in Space

Moscow, October 3, 2007 – Russia's military space commander vowed to retaliate with an arms race if any country started putting weapon systems into orbit. . . Space Forces Commander Colonel-General Vladimir Popovkin . . . avoided naming names but his comments follow growing friction over space between Moscow, Washington and Beijing. Earlier this year China tested an anti-satellite missile and the US has been developing weapons which can hit satellites. . .
Full story:

Bush's Agenda in Iran

October 3, 2007 – The Bush administration is preparing public opinion for a possible bombing attack on Iran. As with the months prior to the Iraq invasion, major Democratic Party leaders are climbing on board.

Half the warships in the US Navy now sit within striking distance of Iran. Bush and Cheney have stepped up their rhetoric accusing Iran of threatening to start a "nuclear holocaust." The British press is predicting that the Bush administration will bomb Iran in the near future.

The White House is using the same propaganda techniques to whip up popular opinion against Iran that it used four years ago against Iraq. Here's the real story: [Emphasis ours].

Iran has no nuclear weapons and couldn't have them for years. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN body that was right about WMDs in Iraq, says it has no proof of Iranian plans to build nuclear bombs. The IAEA recently reached a binding agreement for Iran to reveal its past nuclear activities and allow full inspection of nuclear power sites.

The sophisticated EFPs (explosively formed penetrators) supposedly supplied by Iran to militias in Iraq are easily made in Iraqi machine shops and can be purchased commercially for mining operations . . .

For two years the United States has helped splinter groups among Iran's ethnic minorities to blow up buildings, assassinate Revolutionary Guards and kill civilians in an effort to destabilize the Tehran regime. In short, the United States does to Iran what it accuses Iran of doing in Iraq. . . Full story:

Comment: Espousing the ungodly agenda of George II, shabbos Goy, John Haggee declared, "It is time for America to . . . consider a military preemptive strike against Iran to prevent a nuclear holocaust in Israel and a nuclear attack in America." [A BIG LIE]. "When 50 million evangelical Bible-believing Christians unite with five million American Jews standing together on behalf of Israel, it is a match made in heaven." According to Moses (Deuteronomy 7), Isaiah 34, Amos 3:3, Malachi 1:1-5, and Jesus Christ (Matthew 23; 25:1-13), this is another BIG LIE. God made covenant with Israel, not Jews, who are a different race and religion God set at "enmity" with the children of Israel (Genesis 3:15; 27:39-41). One more BIG LIE. The word "Jew" was in NO Bible until the 18th century, and it has a different meaning to the words it has replaced. Christians have nothing in common with Jews, and Christians have little in common with "evangelicals".

The BIG LIE - Part IV

One of our new subscribers has asked, "Is race mixing forbidden by the Bible"?

I replied: Yes, your preacher will not teach you this truth, which is absolutely essential to an understanding of Scripture. The "original sin" was miscegenation between Eve and the Serpent, a giant man-like creature before God changed every bone in his body and placed him on his belly. He was not a human being as he was without a soul, but that place was incarnate by Satan, who is a spirit. He seduced Eve who taught her husband the secret of procreation, which is why "she is forbidden to teach, or to usurp authority over the man" (I Timothy 2:11-15). Eve had two seeds in her womb and bore two races: a case of superfetation. God placed "enmity" between the race of Cain, who was vicariously begotten of Satan by means of the Serpent (I John 2:13-14; 3:12), and the race of Adam (Genesis 3:15).

This enmity is extant as exhibited by the conduct of our alien controllers who work under a different name and in another occupation, hiding their true identity by imposing 'political correctness' behind anti-discrimination and anti-vilification laws which are anti-Christian and censor the thought and speech of their victims lest, as Cain wailed, every one that discovers my true identity will slay me" (Genesis 4:14). Their loud whines accuse others of the very crimes they have committed or are committing; they are heard only by those who lack faith, which is a clear understanding of the revealed Word of God, in particular patronizing self-serving cowards whom the 'hidden hand' promotes to leadership in Church, politics, education, industry and society because of their dependable innate and persistent ignorance.

British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli called these controllers the 'hidden hand'. US President Woodrow Wilson said, "Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so persuasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it" (Benjamin Disraeli, Conningsby; Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom p. 13-14).

This "race mixing" is genocide to Adam's race because the offspring is in Cain's race and can never breed itself back. Adam and the Serpent were creative Words of God; the mixed seed of the Serpent—Cain and his offspring—are not Word; not God's creation, but hybrids like church creeds which are God's Word that has been added to or taken from, and no longer "His Spirit and Life" (John 6:63), but human reasoning against the Word, and DEATH. God can only redeem (i.e. reclaim and buy back) His own Word, which is His eternal thoughts expressed.

The Book of Life is God's foreknowledge of Adam's genealogy. Each soul is placed on free moral agency: its decisions will determine whether it remains on the Book and is "saved," or blotted from that Book and Lost. Cain and his race do not descend from Adam, are not on the Book of Life, and are irredeemably LOST. The Lamb's Book of Life is the record of God's foreknowledge of His elect—those who will be spiritually regenerated or born-again by the Last Adam, Jesus Christ. These names can never be removed from the Book.

Miscegenation became so prevalent in the days of Noah (Genesis 6:1-4) that God allowed evil men with nuclear technology to cause earth to move off its axis, creating precipitation and the fracturing of earth's mantle, resulting in the great Flood. The wife Noah took with him in the ark was Naamah, the sister of Tubalcain the Serpent. Ham committed incest with his father's wife (who was not the mother of Noah's sons). Their offspring was Canaan through whom the world was again repopulated by Cain's race. Jesus prophesied the conditions and sin of the days of Noah would repeat in the days of His second or 'parousia' Coming, which was 1963 and continues to the present day: the revelation of the Seven Seals brought Christ back to earth in WORD form (I Corinthians 13:10; Revelation 10:1-7). Today however, miscegenation is hailed as genius, and euphemistically called "multiculturalism," which is a BIG LIE, because it is "multi-racialism," the repetition of the "original sin" on a worldwide scale, and accursed of God.

God's law of reproduction is Genesis 1:11 (Amos 3:3; Revelation 22:18-19). God separated the different nations by rivers and oceans, and mountains and deserts, by language and culture and physical attributes (Genesis 10:5, 20, 31; 11:6-9; Deuteronomy 32:8). No descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, or one who believes Moses and the prophets, and no Christian would encourage this wickedness, yet the Judaeo-Communist United Nations Organization, busily establishing Lucifer's totalitarian one world government, has mandated this curse; while the City of London is stealing the resources of her colonies, cheered on by her sycophants and the apostate church, is creating waves of inassimilable refugees as pawns designed to divide and conquer the (once) Christian nations.

These sinners who do not obey God's Holy Bible, nor believe in Jesus Messiah, do not realize they are fulfilling His prophecy of Matthew 24:37, "As it was in the days of Noah, so shall the [parousia] Coming of the Son of man be." They know not that He in whom they do not believe has "come as a thief in the night".

Multiculturalism and Christianity in America

By Louis F. DeBoer

Multiculturalism, or diversity as it is also known, is all the rage in our contemporary culture. Value is found in almost any and every form of cultural expression. It is loudly touted that this kind of cultural diversity enriches our society. It is vehemently asserted that only a fool, and a bigoted, prejudiced fool at that, would discountenance the benefits of cultural diversity. No matter how pagan or primitive, no matter how racked with superstition and depravity, any culture is to be valued for its contribution to this diversity. The fact that the values of these alternate cultures are often at radical variance with the traditional values of our own culture doesn't seem to matter and only seems to enhance the appeal of the alternates.

In fact there is generally only one exception to this drive for diversity and to this exaltation of diverse cultures, and that is to cultural expressions of Christianity. Christianity alone is considered outside the pale. Christianity alone is found to have no redeeming value that merits its acceptance in the family of cultures. Christianity alone is exempt from the tolerance that makes it politically incorrect to criticize other cultures. In fact it seems that the Apostles of multiculturalism are prepared to be totally inconsistent in this regard. Why is this? Is it because they have properly realized that Christianity alone is the misfit that will never fit into their scheme of things?

Why is Christianity the lone exception? There are two significant reasons for this. One is that Christianity, Biblical Christianity that is and not some contemporary counterfeit as peddled by the liberal churches, is uncompromisingly against this trend. Christianity claims an exclusiveness that is intolerable to the apostles of multiculturalism. Christianity states that it has the truth and all other religions are false. Christianity teaches that Jesus the Christ is "the Way" and that all other ways lead to perdition. Christianity claims to have an infallible standard of truth, the Scriptures, by which all other religions must be judged.

Secondly, as many such as Rushdoony have said, "culture is religion externalized." And among religions as we have noted above Christianity is unique. Christianity is not only an exclusive religion: Christianity is not only the one true religion: Christianity is a divinely established religion. It is from above. All other religions have one thing in common, they are manmade. Therefore ultimately, all other religions are but variant expressions of humanism. Therefore it is easier for them to tolerate one another and accept their mutual cultural expressions.

However, in spite of all that, multiculturalism still doesn't appear to make sense. Why should a people who have been as successful as the American people adopt such madness. A nation that has come to dominate the entire world economically, politically, militarily and culturally is a strange candidate for multiculturalism. For such a nation to denigrate its own culture and place it on par with cultures that have only produced superstition, ignorance, fatalism, and poverty is indeed strange; strange to the point of madness. After all historically we valued our own culture over all others. Our founding fathers saw it as a blessing of providence that we were a unified people. They saw it as providing a stable foundation for the republic that they established. They rejoiced that we were one people, with a common language, a common history, a common culture, and a common faith. For at the time of the founding of the republic we were overwhelmingly an Anglo-Saxon people, speaking English, with a common tradition of Western civilization and the English common law, and a common faith, Christianity. In fact, at that time, Bancroft tells us that the United States was 98% Protestant and 67% Calvinist. We were one people. Diversity need not apply!

This commitment to national unity over against diversity was reflected in our immigration policies. Initially immigration was generally restricted to such White Anglo-Saxon Protestant nations as England, Scotland, the Netherlands, and Germany etc. Later this was relaxed to allow for immigration from the Catholic nations of Europe. Eventually it was relaxed to allow for immigration from nations practicing non-Christian religions. Unity, not diversity was historically cherished by the leaders of the American nation. [Two significant departures from the generally wise policies of the founding Fathers have come back to haunt America. One was to allow Jewish immigration into a Christian Republic. We have paid a high price for this mistake. The Jewish community in America has in general been extremely liberal, extremely influential, and extremely intent on undermining the Christian character of the American Republic. Hollywood and the media, both significantly influenced by the Jewish community, have been waging war on traditional American culture for decades, and they have been highly successful. The second tragic mistake was the importation of Negro slaves. Much of what is degenerate in American culture can be traced back to its origins in the Negro subculture. Sexual promiscuity, immoral music and dance have come into the main stream from their origins in the Black community. As God warned Israel, allowing subversive, non-Christian cultures in our midst, would turn out to be a curse to us as a nation and truly as thorns in our sides]. And although I would say nothing to attempt to justify the historic treatment of the American Indian nations, with the long litany of atrocities, injustices, and broken treaties, one thing is clear. Historically Americans were determined to have one culture. And that culture was to be an Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture. They had no intention of seeking to coexist with the cultures of the 500 odd Indian nations that existed at the time of America's founding. The goal was the civilization and the Christianization of the Indian peoples.

Why then this drive to diversity. Why a drive that can only end in national suicide. Why promote that which has been the death and destruction of so many nations? Why promote the kind of cultural and ethnic strife that has torn apart so many nations from the Balkans to the Orient. After its independence in 1948 India was racked with sectarian strife between Moslems and Hindus that led to the creation of the Pakistani state. Since then Moslem, Hindu, and Sikh have battled for cultural dominance and massacred each other as opportunity presented itself. In the Balkans these age old rivalries have erupted in a series of wars in the last decade. From Northern Ireland with the strife between Irish Catholics and Scotch-Irish Protestants, to Canada with the strife between the Anglo-Protestant provinces and a French-Catholic Quebec, to the Basque Separatist movement in Spain etc., etc., diversity and multiculturalism has been a recipe for national disaster.

Why then promote an agenda that is tantamount to national suicide? The answer lies in the extreme enmity to Christianity and its exclusiveness. At the risk of destroying the nation our leaders are willing to advance any agenda that will undermine and destroy Christianity. For they know that Christianity and multiculturalism cannot coexist. Once it surrenders its exclusiveness Christianity has been destroyed. Then it is as the Scriptures state "salt that has lost its saviour" and is only fit to be cast out and trodden underfoot. Only a virulent hatred of Christianity and its exclusive claims can make a nation tread the perilous path of multiculturalism. Surely, as the Scriptures declare, "All they that hate me love death".

For the Scriptures make it abundantly clear that multiculturalism is the death of the faith. For this reason God suspended the normal rules of war that he gave Moses and commanded Joshua to exterminate the Canaanites. For the corrupt and degenerate culture of the Canaanites to coexist side by side with the culture established by the Mosaic economy would have been an impossibility. It would have destroyed the latter as God repeatedly warned.

"And the Lord spoke unto Moses in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When you are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan; Then you shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places. But if you will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which you let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein you dwell" (Numbers 33:50-52,55).

Israel was commanded to exterminate Canaanite society and destroy all the remnants of this culture. Having been delivered from Egyptian culture, Israel was not to celebrate the diversity that Canaanite, Moabite, Ammonite, and Edomite cultures had to offer. The whole ceremonial law had as one of its purposes to maintain the exclusiveness of Israel and preserve her from amalgamation with the surrounding nations. The dietary laws were designed to minimize social intercourse with the heathen. All the requirements with respect to ceremonial cleanliness and all the inconvenient rituals for being cleansed from ceremonial uncleanness were designed to minimize involvement with heathen cultures. Israel was separated from the nations and called to be a holy people consecrated to the worship and service of the true God. Multiculturalism would have been the death knell for such a people. Repeatedly they were warned against intermarriage with the heathen. Constantly they were commanded not adopt the customs and traditions of the pagan and idolatrous nations that surrounded them. They were called of God to be a separate and distinct people, an exclusive people set apart for his special purposes.

And all this is of course also true of the Lord's people today. We also are called to a separate people. Of us the Apostle Peter says, "But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that you should show forth the praises of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light" (I Peter 2:9). We too are commanded to be separate from the heathen and to us God commands, "Be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: For what fellowship has righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion has light with darkness? And what concord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has he that believes with an infidel? And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God has said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be separate, says the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and you shall be My sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty" (II Corinthians 6:14-18). For the Lord's people today to adopt multiculturalism would be as deadly today as it was for Israel of old.

God condemned the multiculturalism of Ahab when he allowed his wife to place the worship of Baal on a par with worship of Yahweh. Nehemiah rejected the offers of the heathen to build Jerusalem together as a common enterprise, and he rebuked the Israelites who intermarried with the heathen. The former brought Israel under the Lord's judgment and the latter preserved her from apostasy. These are lessons that we have to continue to bear in mind. Christians in America are paying a high price for having remembered them too late if at all. They are finding out that it is becoming progressively more difficult to function as Christians in a non-Christian culture. They are realizing now how difficult it is to raise up covenant children in the midst of an ungodly culture. Multiculturalism is the death of Christianity, which can only continue to exist in such a society in the catacombs as a persecuted and despised minority. A high price to pay for as a nation for having rejected the truth of God in favor of tolerance, diversity, and acceptance of that which God has rejected. May God forgive us and call us to national repentance for our folly!

Comment: Brother Branham said that 1956, the jubilee year of the Pentecostal or Laodicean Age was America's last opportunity for national repentance. He subsequently stated that America rejected the grace of God. The centenary of the San Francisco earthquake and upcoming jubilee fell on the day of Pentecost, April 18, 2006. Soon we will be blessed with the Pentecostal jubilee for which "the whole of nature has groaned and travailed in pain together until now".

The purpose of multiculturalism is to destroy Adam's race and Christianity, to gender hatred and intolerance that will divide and conquer society in every nation, so that after World War III is ended, those who aspire to undisputed world domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known:

"We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will be from that moment without compass, anxious for an ideal, but with out knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time" (William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game, p. xv-xvi).

The few living Christians there are will be translated seven years beforehand, for this scenario will become Armageddon with the consummation of life on earth: then comes the Millennium. nl497.htm

Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

Bible Believers' Church
Currabubula NSW
Australia 2342
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers' Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe to Newsletter Unsubscribe from Newsletter