A Sad but Holy God - As it was in the Days of Lot

"A Sad but Holy God":-

"Australia lucky country, or so you used to be.

Land of Settler's pride - I hope they never see.

Babies piled in dumagsers, abortion on demand.

Sweet land of liberty, your home is on the sand.

People wander aimlessly, poisoned by cocaine.

Choosing to indulge, when God said to abstain.

From sea to shining sea our country turns away,

From the teaching of God's Word and the need to always pray.

Phony TV preachers tell lies about our Rock,

Saying God is going broke, so they can fleece the flock.

We've voted in a government that's rotten to the core,

Appointing godless judges, who throw reason out the door.

Too soft to place the killer in his well deserved tomb.

But brave enough to kill the child before he leaves the womb.

You think that God's not angry, our land's a moral slum?

How much evil will He watch before His kingdom's come?

How are we to face a God, from whom we cannot hide?

What is left for us to do, to stem this evil tide?

If WE who are called, would humbly turn and pray.

If WE would seek His holy face, and leave our evil way,

Then God would hear from heaven, and forgive us of our sins.

It's too late now for this country and those who live within.

Australia, lucky country - it's too late for you to see,

A sad but holy God's withdrawn His hand from thee."

The people are so inherently decent in themselves, they can't even conceive that the politicians would betray them, their children, and their nation.

Australia has one thing to look to after Christ takes His Bride to the Wedding Supper of the Lamb in the Sky. That's the tribulation, when the whole world will be ruled by Rome, and the Pharisees who killed our Lord Jesus, and their Messiah.

An item last week stated, that following the news and weather on Italy's national radio, they read a horoscope, prepared daily by the Media, in consultation with 100 clairvoyants.

The mainstream media reported that union, church, business and welfare groups said One Nation policies threaten Australia's jobs, reputation and economy.

These unions are subservient to the big businessmen who con them into believing that dropping tariffs makes Australia competitive, and creates jobs.

The big businessmen are not Australian. They can't be, because 90% of Australia's large corporations are foreign-owned. They pretend Australians love a level playing field, which gives multinationals open season to prey on small local competitors.

The welfare groups are represented by moronic party hacks, given plum jobs, in key positions, to politicize the welfare system and promote the ALP long after it became the tool of big and dirty business. Church leaders are just red and rotten pseudo-religious rats, pushed into churches in the sixties and seventies to use the power of the pulpit to promote socialism.

Once the socialists found they got richer, quicker, selling their honour to big business, the power of centralized government was used to sell our assets at fire-sale prices. The religious rats suddenly supported any dirty deal put up by big business. The founders of Labor must roll in their graves as the political swill that's permeated these groups betrays everything Labor stood for.

Big city media uses these fools to orchestrate their own political agenda, but many of the people are waking up fast. The left has joined the coalition to betray Australia. Soon these parties will amalgamate because they fear Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party. They have good reason. It's surely the best thing to happen in Australian politics since the Second World War.

It's long been recognized among geopoliticians that the most effective way to undermine society is to change the value systems embraced by its citizens. To accomplish this goal in Australia, the international conspirators knew that it was essential to gain control of our schools and colleges. These institutions could then be used as potent tools in their "urban renewal" program. They're in the business of destroying the 'old order' of society, and replacing it with a NEW order. The institutions could also be used to 're-educate' (or brainwash) coming generations of Australians, into acceptance of an alien philosophy which would ultimately lead to their descent into slavery.

In America, this assault on society was led by the Rockefellers and their General Education Board. Their aim, as expressed by Dr. Harold Ruggs in The Great Technology, (1933, page 32), was the "creation of a new public mind.... Old stereotypes must be broken down, and "new climates of opinion" formed in the neighborhoods of America."

The subversive system of "progressive education," financed by the Rockefellers and their associates, and directed by John Dewey, was used in the early years to sow and nurture the seeds designed to destroy traditional education.

This assault was somewhat modified with the arrival in Washington of Franklin Roosevelt in 1933 and the publication, in the same year, of the Humanist Manifesto. This document, which many modern educators look upon as their "Bible," was revised and brought up to date in 1973. Though a short document, Humanist Manifestos I and II lay bare the methods that are being used to subvert our nation's youth through the government school system. This statement may appear to be an overly harsh indictment of the school system, but, as we'll see, it's fully justified.

Many people refer to our "public schools," but this is a hideous misnomer. Public schools don't exist. As Barbara Morris points out in "Change Agents in the Schools", the word "public" implies belonging to or controlled by the people. "Schools" are thought to be places where children study and learn "the wisdom of the ages," and are exposed to civilizing Influences."

However, in the final analysis "public schools" are not controlled by people in the community. Directly or indirectly, through control or funding for curriculum development, teacher training etc., the real power rests in the hands of the government. This makes them government schools; local boards are just so much window dressing.

As Mrs. Morris shows, government schools "exist to promote change... social change, political change, religious change, change in our form of government. Total change.

"But specifically, change from what to what? Change from a Christian sovereign nation to a Humanist/Socialist interdependent nation-state in a dictatorship euphemistically called a "global community" with "world citizens" content with enslavement.

"In particular, government schools are striving to destroy the status, structure and stability of the family. Strong families make a strong nation and they must be eliminated if the proposed dictatorship is to be established and maintained. Look at your family and the families you know. How stable are they? The breakdown you see isn't just 'happening' - the chaos is planned."

"We now have nothing less than a revolution taking place. Schools have become open agents of social change, working steadily to enthrone the 'articles of faith' of the religion of Humanism... Attitudes, values, and behaviors must be changed for the coming NWO that will involve, at the same time, the worship of man and the enslavement of mankind. A terrifying prospect that's already upon us."

Mrs. Morris delves into every aspect of this Humanist attack upon our traditional values, and paints a devastatingly powerful picture of the crime being perpetrated upon our nation's greatest asset - its youth - by 'change agents in the schools.'

Quoting directly from top authorities in the field of education, Mrs. Morris draws a frightening picture of what is taking place behind the closed doors of America's classrooms. What emerges is indisputable evidence of a carefully planned, skillfully executed, no-holds-barred assault by the 'change agents' on all of the values, principles, and convictions that served to make America a giant among the pygmies on the international scene.

Harold D. Drummond, writing in Educational Leadership, December, 1964, p. 147, tells us that "the basic goal of education is change ... and the specific focus is changing people."

Another Humanist, Carl Rogers, states emphatically that "the goal of education must be to develop individuals who are open to change ... to develop a society in which people can live more comfortably with change than rigidity" (Educational Leadership, May 1976, p.717).

Did you get that? Students must be brainwashed into rejecting traditional 'rigid' values in favor of the 'anything goes' philosophy of situation ethics. (For a Christian this sounds like blasphemy, but the Talmud has a teaching called "hora'ath she' ah," which means that a special dispensation can be given to meet the requirement of the moment. It is from this teaching the Christians were polluted in the 1960's with the theology known as "situation ethics.")

The National Education Association (NEA) contemptuously rejects teachers who strive to instill patriotism and sound moral judgment in their students: "Teachers who conform to the traditional institutional mode are out of place. They might find fulfillment as tap-dance instructors, or guards in maximum security prisons, or as proprietors of reducing salons ... but they damage teaching, children and themselves by staying in the classroom" (Schools For the 70s and Beyond, 1971, p. 76).

We need to match Bible prophecy with historic fact or actuality in order to identify God's living Word. For instance in Malachi 4:5-6 we read, "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD: And he'll turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse".

In these two verses we have several prophetic facts which sinners attribute to John the Baptist:-

The historical actuality is that 2,000 years have passed since John the Baptist and the great and dreadful day of the Lord or end of the Gentile dispensation is yet future. So John the Baptist wasn't THIS Elijah!

The fathers were the Patriarchs of the Old Testament but they died long before John's day. Had John fulfilled these Words of prophecy in his lifetime a resurrection of the Patriarchs would be required and John would've denied the Law of Moses and all the prophets who came after the Patriarchs.

The fact is, that nearly four years after his death, after Calvary and Pentecost, John's ministry resulted in the hearts of the apostolic fathers turning to the children born of God's Spirit - both Israelites and Gentiles.

This part of Malachi's prophecy can't pertain to John because it speaks of a ministry restoring the "apostolic faith" which was revealed after the days of John. Had this been John, he would've denied the Law of Moses, the Messiah he forerun, and restored the teachings of the Patriarchs.

The historic fact is that John was the Elijah of Malachi 3;1, "My messenger, shall prepare the way before Me: and the Lord, Whom you seek, shall suddenly come to His Temple, even the Messenger of the (New) Covenant, in Whom you delight. . ." He was not the Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6, who would RESTORE - "ALL things that God's spoken by the mouth of ALL His holy prophets since the world began" - the FULLNESS of the Word, Christ, "before the great and dreadful day of the Lord" (Acts 3:21; I Corinthians 13:10; Revelation 10:7).

How could John restore the Fullness of the Word when It was "sealed with Seven Seals unto the time of the end" (Daniel 12:4, 9 and Revelation 10:4)?

According to Jesus, John restored nothing. On the contrary, John "laid the ax to the root of all trees (or denominational teachings of Pharisees, Sadducees, Herodians, Essenes, Zealots, etc)".

4) After the heart of God's children is restored to the apostolic faith, tribulation plagues will smite the earth and all on it with their curse.

This Elijah was not John, because 2,000 years have passed, and God hasn't yet smitten the earth with a curse.

Now we know the Jews were looking for Messiah to come kick out the Romans and restore the throne of David. That's the Millennium and the THIRD (or the second PHYSICAL) Coming of the glorified Christ. Israel wanted a General but God sent a Baby according to His Word.

The Pharisees asked John if he was the Christ. When he said "No", they asked, "Are you the Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6"? Again he said, "No". They asked, "If you're not Messiah and you're not the Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6, who are you"? John replied, "I'm the Elijah of Malachi 3:1, the Elijah of Isaiah 40:3". Read it - John 1:19-26.

John knew who he was. And he knew his Commission. So did the Holy Spirit speaking through an angel to his father, Zacharias, "And he shall go before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord." The Holy Spirit identified John as the Elijah of Malachi 3:1 whose ministry would also fulfill the first part of Malachi 4:6.

Before God can do anything of great moment, He must first signify it in the heavens (Psalm 19:1-5), and reveal It through a prophet (Amos 3:7). So before God can end the Gentile dispensation, he has to send a prophet. And according to the Scriptures we've just read this prophet will do two things: first he'll RESTORE the apostolic faith; secondly, he'll "FINISH the mystery of God" concealed under the Seven Seals of the Book of Revelation.

Whoever the prophet is, he'll come from America, because Zechariah 14:7 and Matthew 24:27-28 foretell the same SON-Light that rose in Jerusalem in the East will be restored in the West or evening-time just before the close of our Dispensation. We know he will come to a morally depraved Gentile civilization like Sodom and Gomorrah. We know his ministry will reveal Jesus Christ veiled behind flesh again by the Sign that revealed God in the Son of Man, and veiled behind a created Man in the days of Lot (Luke 17:28-30; Genesis 18; Hebrews 4:12).

We know God will vindicate this prophet by discerning the thoughts and intents of people's hearts "as it was in the days of Lot", by raising the dead, healing the sick, restoring sight to the blind, and casting out demons.

So if we can match Bible prophecy with historic fact or actuality, we've identified God's living vindicated Word. And we're bound to receive the prophet's Message and prove It from Genesis through to Revelation to ensure we have the mind of Christ in us. I believe that prophet was the late William Branham. There are many articles on Bible Believers' web site which you may study for yourselves in conjunction with the Bible. radio115.htm
.../Back to Index

A Sad but Holy God - As it was in the Days of Lot

e-mail to: ags@